reeteshv
Latest twist in legal battle over chip upstart Nuvia
Cloud-Services Company Cloudflare Discloses Potential Sanctions Violations
Amazon, Microsoft chosen to compete for Pentagon cloud computing contract
Google’s Hope and Dreams in India
The Fox in the Time Machine
https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/asaram-bapu-rape-accus...
The sysadmin who took down a drug lord
1. Each TV channel in a bouquet of channels will have a fixed & uniform, maximum, retail price. 2. Any channel that was priced above the fixed price could not be included in a bouquet and could only be offered on an individual/a la carte/standalone basis. 3. Pay channels and free to air channels, as also HD and standard channels, could not be in the same bouquet.
The satellite TV/cable broadcasters went all the way up to the Supreme Court but have lost the war!
SC rejects challenge to Trai’s power to cap cost of TV channels
Otto Warmbier: what happened in the North Korean jail that led to his death?
India’s Supreme court rules Aadhaar ID program doesn’t violate privacy rights
'Today is D-Day': Rescuers begin mission to extract Thai cave boys
Talkin’ Treble: How Android engineers are winning the war on fragmentation
Reading the Wikipedia entry, I was stuck by how the founders list control of their firm, "Unhappily for us, no bank would lend us money; bankers hadn’t yet come to think of rocketry as a stable business."
Interestingly, a tire company acquired majority control!
As the cliché goes, "don't cry because it ended; smile because it happened."
I think that the best way to show respect to the developer is to contribute time and/or money to the project.
At the very least, be thankful and don't act like a jerk!
New Zealand just took care of a $3.6M mouse infestation
Hence, this clarification...
As per my understanding, there is plenty of Drama in the security vulnerability incident - Intel CEO selling a large chunk of stock after the company was informed of the vulnerability; the differing views on the actual performance impact of the patches, the discussions on whether it was a genuine oversight error or corporate greed that led to the situation in the first place, etc.
The reason I mentioned this along with the original article is simply because I was trying to clarify that there have always been dramatic posts/comments on HN.
Therefore, sharing an article from r/Drama sub-reddit didn't seem sacrilegious to me.
I apologise if I have offended your sensibilities...
If we want to avoid drama, we should stop sharing a significant number of recent events, e.g. the Meltdown and Spectre drama, launches, touchdowns and failures of SpaceX, a majority of anti-Google comments, etc.
Surely, Damore's screed was also written with the same expectation?
To be perfectly clear, I'm not siding with Damore's inferences or conclusions.
Tomorrow, someone will object to linking a WSJ article as it's a conservative newspaper.
Then, somebody else will object against The Guardian for it being too left-leaning.