prosim
Re:GitHub Copilot's new desktop app
on Thursday May 14, 2026 @01:38PM (#48138582)
Like Copilot CLI, but now Copilot also has a desktop app. Next to github.com, GitHub Desktop, GitHub Mobile, and Copilot in VS Code, somebody will explain the strategy of this... one day.
Re:GitHub Copilot: Remote Code Execution via Prompt Injection (CVE-202...
on Wednesday August 13, 2025 @08:36PM (#44895541)
tl;dr: Vuln only possible by placing Copilot into YOLO mode. And it's fixed with the August Patch Tuesday release.
GitHub Copilot: Remote Code Execution via Prompt Injection (CVE-2025-53773)
Re:Copilot exposes private GitHub pages, some removed by Microsoft
on Thursday February 27, 2025 @09:39PM (#43201116)
To quote from the article: "These repositories, belonging to more than 16,000 organizations, were originally posted to GitHub as public, but were later set to private [..]" Once things are public, they will forever remain public (in some form). That's how the internet works.
Re:Copilot exposes private GitHub pages, some removed by Microsoft
on Thursday February 27, 2025 @09:38PM (#43201107)
Flagged yesterday already. Still a non-story today: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43183333
Re:Exposed GitHub repos, now private, can be accessed through Copilot
on Wednesday February 26, 2025 @08:56AM (#43183620)
tl;dr Bing indexed and cached a public repository, then made it available to its AI chat. Later, the repository author switched the repository to private and understood how the internet works. And the story gets only better as the author is the founder of a “cybersecurity” company.
Re:Show HN: Free Xcode Extension for GitHub Copilot and Codeium
on Tuesday September 10, 2024 @10:50AM (#41501367)
Is this a fork of https://github.com/intitni/CopilotForXcode? OSS under MIT license, which CoderKit is not.
Codeium built a proprietary coding LLM
Re:GitHub Copilot is not infringing your copyright
on Thursday July 11, 2024 @08:36AM (#40936015)
He started at GitHub 3 years after the article was written. Don't think GitHub's interview process takes that long. ;)
Re:GitHub Copilot is not infringing your copyright
on Thursday July 11, 2024 @08:34AM (#40936001)
Except the article is dated in URL and sidebar to July 5, 2021.
Gitlab Duo Workflow, autonomous AI agent
Tabnine's vision for the future: The Atlassian Jira-to-code AI agent
GitHub Artifact Attestations
Re:Show HN: Open-source x64 and Arm GitHub runners. Reduces GitHub Act...
on Tuesday January 30, 2024 @05:17PM (#39196658)
Depends on how you define "embrace". Services like Ubicloud violate the GitHub Terms of Service.
Abusing GitHub for Malicious Infrastructure
GitHub Actions as a time-sharing supercomputer
Sourcegraph Cody Is Generally Available
Defensibility in GenAI: What AI Startups Can Learn from GitHub Copilot
GitHub Copilot loses an average of $20 per month per user
Re:Security Weaknesses of Copilot Generated Code in GitHub
on Thursday October 05, 2023 @01:10AM (#37775106)
Footnote 1 on page 2 explicitly mentions the 3.5 model and the research in this paper is only about auto completion: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.15033.pdf
And this blog post states “beyond Codex”, again for auto completion: https://github.blog/2023-07-28-smarter-more-efficient-coding...
Lastly, OpenAI states on the original Codex page: “OpenAI Codex is a descendant of GPT-3; its training data contains both natural language and billions of lines of source code from publicly available sources, including code in public GitHub repositories.” - It included GitHub repos, but it never was only GitHub repos. https://openai.com/blog/openai-codex
Update: GitHub Community Manager confirms it here: https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/56975#discussi...
Re:Security Weaknesses of Copilot Generated Code in GitHub
on Wednesday October 04, 2023 @11:23PM (#37774598)
That’s no longer true. Copilot uses the same ChatGPT-3.5 model as, well, ChatGPT. If it were trained on just GitHub projects, the chat features wouldn’t work at all.
Re:Security Weaknesses of Copilot Generated Code in GitHub
on Wednesday October 04, 2023 @11:15PM (#37774556)
They did not prompt at all. They used GitHub’s code search to find projects where the repo owner specified that the code was generated “by Copilot” and the authors took that at face value for all code in the project. Whether the code was actually suggested by Copilot is not at all analyzed in the paper. As such, the results are highly questionable.
Gitness – open-source Git Platform
HuggingFace SafeCoder vs. Closed-Source Code Assistants
Re:I'm moving my projects off GitHub
on Tuesday July 18, 2023 @12:18PM (#36774946)
Your private code is not used for any user other than you: https://docs.github.com/en/enterprise-cloud@latest/copilot/o...