pomstazlesa

No

So what isn't a technology company? FedEx is delivery company that uses technology. McDonald's is a fastfood company that uses technology. Intel is a technology company that uses technology. Oh wait....

Personally, don't

There is no artificial intelligence. Stop listening to marketing department.

You can with new molly.im update

Pocket is still an emulator and not exactly cycle accurate.

https://emulation.gametechwiki.com/index.php/GBA_Tests

Love seeing something like this! I'd really want to run something like this locally but sadly, many of the single word translations I've tried ended up being wrong or even just gibberish. Looking at the issues page, it looks like multiple languages are affected by this.

Ok, boom

> Arm chair generals on social media and those writing for Western media outlets do not. As opposed to those writing for Eastern media outlets, right?

Many modes and maps are missing, so this is more of a forced downgrade, especially for those who were playing them since 2012

And yet most people use Android. Let's be honest, apple is not making products for the most people. It's very much a status thing of "those who have Apple and those who don't"

Said jokethrowaway

I'd rather pay scalper prices than do that

Same thing in Hungary.

> It enables machine-stealing. The sort where the whole content gets copied and hosted on a content farm.

I understand that but lack of RSS is not going to prevent that. It's barely a roadblock for those who steal.

I understand this issue and really feel sorry for anyone who has to deal with this. I just don't understand how explicitly not implementing RSS would even her with this [not saying you specifically claim this]

It's probably both. Since you want to obscure it from the end user, you can also afford to be lazy and have sloppy implementation.

> Having seen quite a few stories like this about WD and sub brands, I'm tempted to just return it for a refund and go elsewhere...

The thing is, where? We don't really have a choice, it's either WD(and sub) or Seagate(and sub) with horror stories on both end. I had a WD red fail 3 weeks after the warranty period, while also having an older WD red that outlived it, chugging along for 6 years now. Now I run a mixes pool of WD and Seagate because ultimately, I don't trust either of them.

Why would anyone willingly choose 1FA, when you have the opportunity to go for 2FA in more than one way. Who are these unicorns, that are opposed to 2FA?

The "free WHOIS protection" is something they have to offer, if they[or anyone else] wants to do business in Europe and be GDPR compliant.