pinwale
I highly doubt that. WeChat is so deeply embedded in daily life in China that I would almost consider it required to do anything substantial in China.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/world/china-watch/technology...
One of the Chinese court systems actually sends notifications through their WeChat account. I believe there are even pilot programs where you can initiate court cases through WeChat as well.
more info: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3apAXzf3JTg
The states had already voted to secede (or not to) earlier in the year. The Confederates had even provisionally elected a president, Jefferson Davis, on February 18th. The secession crisis started after Abraham Lincoln was elected in November of 1860.
The nation really was falling apart, hence the lamentation of the republic being just a collection of states in the editorial.
The idea is the same as Google's Voice Search (and Siri).
The reason why the formalizing the rules is now an issue is because a federal court has thrown out the legal method the FCC had been using to wave at ISPs to be neutral.
So now there is no ruling, and the ISPs wouldn't have spent all that time & money on lawyers to preserve what they just took down.
So right now, the FCC is going to release new rules on the Open Internet. The question is, will it be under a new interpretation of the old method that was thrown out of court (Section 702), or by calling ISPs common carriers and then forbearing most of the sections in Title II (as the court alluded is possible).
T-mobile does this[1] as well as Virgin[2]. Scroll down to see packages like:
* "Unlimited Instagram — Monthly $5.00"
* "Unlimited Pinterest — Monthly $5.00"
* "Unlimited Social — Monthly $15.00"
If you are a web or app startup, it's gonna be might hard to get people to use your product when they can use Facebook or other preferred apps for free.
Sure, the above plans are made for low income demographics but it is a looking glass of what the ISP/telecom companies view as the future of the internet.
[1] http://www.theverge.com/2014/6/18/5822996/t-mobile-music-fre...
Incorrect, the Internet in the United States has been under de-facto net neutrality rules through a patchwork of agreements, policy statements, and regulations.
The current debate is just about formalizing the legal method & the scope of any rules to maintain a "Open Internet". (That is the term that the FCC uses for the various net neutrality issues.)
Reddit is submitting an FCC comment
Contextly files an FCC comment
An electronic signature is as good as a paper signature under the ESign Act of 2000 if they follow this definition:
`electronic sound, symbol, or process attached to or logically associated with a record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the record.`
Hell, even sending the words "I accept" via Morse code over telegraph was considered a legal signature in the 19th century.
However, if there a dispute over the authenticity of the signature and found to be fraudulant, the courts have ruled that it's not a signature then.
All last point asks is people to support Stop Watching Us rally and other campaigns against bulk spying, run a Tor node, or hold a cryptoparty.
Your comments on surveillance tactics/hunger/climate change is just bringing up irrelevant arguments, so I won't address them.
P.S. Sorry to go on a rant, but I miss the days when people actually RTFA. (aka never gonna happen).
http://rapgenius.com/search?hide_unexplained_songs=false&q=h...
Javascript is mentioned in "White & Nerdy" by Weird Al Yankovic. Also, looks like there are non-songs that are being counted into the rap stats.
The fallacy of technology
Design for Color Vision Deficiency for Better Apps
The site design could use a bit of love.
So-called insurgents were only a threat to local presence of Americans and not interested in sticking overseas or be a part of a broader movement against America. Just because they are fighting for their country from their perspective doesn't make it right to say they are the same as terrorists.
You also have to take into account for the loss of goodwill and reputation across the world for hosting Gitmo; particularly when it has possibly radicalized more people simply by having something to point to when a terrorist recruiter propagandizes about the 'evilness of the US' and the merits of attacking us.
Just to compare, a quick google search shows that the U.S. recidivism was around 70%. It might have improved or not since the study period, but it does perspective on the issue.
I learned my lesson. I don't know too much about legal stuff so I'll look into making non-profit. I didn't want to ask for money from people and companies were asking for sponsor World Backup Day. I thought was a nice gesture. Last year, I had a link to bone marrow registry and even had tied the message of being a "backup for a human" to get people to sign up for the registry. I wanted to do something this year, but we ran out of time to settle & create graphics for another cause.
I just wanted it to be a happy and helpful event before April Fool's Day. That is all.
I just wanted want a nice event for everyone. :(
I just didn't want people to mess up their computer because they downloaded something that seemed to be endorsed us (fyi, we don't endorse anyone). That's all.
I had some trouble with scammy companies and I wanted to protect people from thinking we were endorsing them. That's all
Why doesn't anyone believe me? I live in my parent's house and I got a broken car. I love HN because it helped inspire me to do something. That's all. I'm almost crying here. :'(
Please call me at [redacted] if you don't believe me.
But anyone can use the name! We just wanted to protect our visitors. I am just a college student and the site was hand-coded & designed by this awesome redditor who just graduated highschool.