pgsbathhouse2
Good. They should continue.
What a ridiculous statement.
Are you referencing the Benjamin Franklin quote here? Because the quote means the exact opposite of what it is typically used for.
The state has every right and responsibility to defend the general populace against threats in spite of personal wants and wishes.
Yeah, like saving people's lives instead of entertaining some muppet's idea of what it means to be scientific.
Hint: If you're not listening to trained, professional scientists while attempting to sound scientific and curious, you're probably just performing an intellectual jerk off.
You know we can just literally choose to not have this problem, instead of buying into other people's narratives.
>Not once did anyone raise any alarms about, maybe these young people shouldn't go into this line of work
Actually plenty of people do. It's just not a very thrilling subject to the U.S. populace.
You know what can disappear, become depleted, or stretched to thin? Trained medical personal. And money flow can't replenish that resource.
No it doesn't. Like the statement alone doesn't even have any credence, let alone following through with it.
Incredibly daft.
Powershell is a nice idea, but Microsoft is kidding themselves if they think it's even close to the alternatives.
What city?
It was a question. You asked the question, and it can only be asked as a non-rhetorical question if it is predicated on ignorance and some a priori perspective.
>I live in the city
Are you talking about an "actual" city, or an urban sprawl?
What kind of weird question is this? "Downtowns" are _more_ accessible for people, not less. That's why they are more expensive by the foot.
Are you under the belief that there are no markets or services in cities? This seems like a perspective you can get from only living in the suburban non-sense that America has constructed.
Stagnate wages. And instead of raising wages, we lowered interest rates to keep the money flowing going.
As we have just discovered, an entire segment of society is being propped up by the borrowing power of the "middle class" in America.
We have been pulling the wrong levers, and as you've said in not so many words, our current economy is a farce. People are being fed the scraps of the economic pie.
We should give the people their money; their due, proper wages. We should stop formulating economic policies on "the rich should get richer no matter what." It might not be too late to return to sound economic policies that benefit the populace and not a select few, and in return we'd have a more robust economy.
Just the executive branch, which was elected by a certain segment of our society.
Thankfully (hopefully) it only lasts 4 years, and not 20.
We didn't shut down. We stopped doing what's unnecessary.
There's a big difference, and now that reality has made us "wake up" we should probably reevaluate how we structure our economy and society.
This doesn't even happen in markets that are highly competitive. Only professional and strict engineering standards work.
Not voodoo economics.
What claims? Why is such a basic deflection on this site so readily accepted by supposedly intelligent and inquisitive people? This type of discourse and rhetoric is pretty shameful and embarrassing.
What claims do I have that I need to support?
What is it called when someone demands evidence for a counter position when the original position has never been supported?