News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

pgayed

Re:Ask HN: Bay Area neighborhoods to meet other startup people? on Wednesday August 23, 2023 @03:12AM (#37232760)
Thanks! I’m still curious about good neighborhoods for chance encounters though.
Re:Paul Graham on Conversations with Tyler on Thursday August 10, 2023 @01:33AM (#37072346)
PG on the problem with fame: “‘The world sucks because of tech, and tech sucks because of Paul Graham.’” lol
Re:Paul Graham on Conversations with Tyler on Thursday August 10, 2023 @01:08AM (#37072197)
I don't know if it's possible to build an audience as large as Fridman’s without superficial treatment of wide ranging topics.

(I appreciate his efforts but I don't consider him a geek of any discipline or field, limiting his depth overall.)

Re:The Fall of Stack Overflow on Tuesday July 25, 2023 @12:55AM (#36858052)
I hope you still posted (and self-answered).
Re:Threads, an Instagram App on Tuesday July 04, 2023 @12:06AM (#36582116)
Yes, agreed. HN archetype usually predicts failure of the introduced product or its irrelevance.

But maybe it goes the other way with clones. (“[Original thing] doesn't stand a chance. Releasing [Clone] will totally kill the userbase.”)

Re:Threads, an Instagram App on Monday July 03, 2023 @11:38PM (#36581915)
Interactions on Meta follow “proximity”-based neighborhood customs (birthdays, pictures of kids, social flexing, vacations). Polite society dinner talk. You do not need to be followed on Meta, only liked.

Interactions on Twitter follow “rules” of interest-based disputes and discussion (sports, finance, AI dooming, technology predictions). You do not need to be liked on Twitter, only followed.

Interactions on LinkedIn follow Gervais Principles.

Re:Ask HN: Best value Comp. Sc. book for 100€? on Sunday July 02, 2023 @09:25PM (#36567626)
It is so difficult to write challenging exams that only top-tier (“devoted”) professors do.
Re:Trick Yourself into Breaking a Bad Habit on Sunday June 04, 2023 @02:08PM (#36187897)
“Friends”: a group of people who reinforce among themselves a particular worldview and the permissible behaviors that go with it
Deliver an approximate or good-enough solution to buy yourself time.
Reduce the problem to a simpler one you know how to solve.
Re:Jessica Livingston Interviews Paul Graham on Friday May 19, 2023 @12:11AM (#35997639)
I would happily welcome a 9- to 10-hour oral history from Paul Graham.
Re:Transcending My Father's Abuse on Sunday May 07, 2023 @04:19AM (#35849117)
> After all, I had no right to chastise him for yelling when I was screaming at him myself. Maybe I had the temper problem, not him.

I don’t know what I want to call this fallacy. Maybe tit-for-tat fallacy.

One person’s bad behavior doesn’t “annihilate” or vacate the other’s. They don't “cancel out”.

The tactic is (reflexively) used to derail the interrogator and change subject.

“Yes, it is true I am also verbally abusive but right now we're talking about your verbal abuse.”

It's not that this line of reasoning works with the abuser but at least it's a reminder to oneself what's being attempted.

Re:The Nature of Code (Book) on Saturday April 29, 2023 @05:30AM (#35751442)
I like it!

Here's one I use to decide from a list of free-form submissions whether to generate a link or a Google search:

  (fn [pair-of]
    (let [text (get pair-of 1)]
      (cond 
        (clojure.string/starts-with? text "http")
          (list [:a {:href text} (truncate text 60)] [:br])
        :else (list [:a {:href (str "https://google.com/search?q=" text)} text] [:br]))))
Doesn't always work but works often enough! ;)
Re:Startup Playbook on Saturday April 29, 2023 @05:23AM (#35751425)
Are you describing a particular experience you had?
Re:The Nature of Code (Book) on Wednesday April 26, 2023 @05:10PM (#35720061)

  (map link-expander list-of-links)
I wonder what it looks like in Arc…
Re:User: Junnn11 on Wednesday April 19, 2023 @07:22PM (#35634551)
Related to this thread, generally, is Simon Baron Cohen’s The Pattern Seekers: How Autism Drives Human Invention https://www.amazon.com/Pattern-Seekers-Autism-Drives-Inventi...
Re:Indie Hackers is indie again on Thursday April 06, 2023 @06:47PM (#35475555)
Yes, but my argument is they were not engineering the payments infrastructure.

Do you think the Allens had commit privileges to the Stripe codebase? That seems unlikely.

Re:Indie Hackers is indie again on Thursday April 06, 2023 @02:23AM (#35464863)
$300k each sounds high. I don't believe they had reports. It was its own fiefdom. Probably closer to ~$200k. I don't believe they are Bay Area–based, either, where 300 might make more sense.
Re:Indie Hackers is indie again on Thursday April 06, 2023 @01:52AM (#35464653)
> isn't pressed to make money

At $0 MRR, that's exactly what they are.

This is not a dig but the (current) reality of community sites.

At Stripe, they were probably being paid as marketers, not engineering managers. (No team, no direct reports.)

One problem is that indie hackers, by self selection, are not typically investable. If you're not looking to raise, the forum you spend your time on can't, say, buy equity in you or funnel you toward a batch-based accelerator program.

Maybe the Allens can do micro-investments, but again you have a selection problem at play.

They could choose advertising and decide to grow the base. Then they start competing with outlets like The Hustle, My First Million and Morning Brew.

The group of people who want to be indie hackers is much smaller than the group who enjoy “business news” (Morning Brew) or business entertainment (My First Million).

Whatever the Allens decide, I hope they succeed.

> One warning is perhaps in order---this territory we are entering can become a fantastic time-sink. Hours can slip by, people can come and go, and you'll be locked into Cyberspace. Remember to do your work!

> With that, I welcome you, the new user, to The Net.

Older »