penskymaterial

Then why do you keep editing your post doing just that?

> cost effectively nothing to keep up

That's not how it works in any competently run business or public sector.

> some sort of fascist apologist

Nice personal attack, bruh.

https://youngkim.house.gov/2024/11/08/reps-kim-crow-lead-bil...

> In June 2024, the Office of the SIGAR submitted a sunset plan to ensure a smooth shutdown process and effective and timely transfer

No, I didn't consider, I muttered "this is fucking stupid" under my breath and tossed the bread in my cart.

When you dilute the meaning of a warning so much, it becomes meaningless.

Learn to control your emotions.

Apparently burning toast can generate trace amounts of acrylamide.

This was enough to convince me a subset of these people are complete lunatics.

Uhm, OpenBSD would like a word, buddy.

https://man.openbsd.org/unveil

This is a natural evolution of technology.

How many people outraged at this have clicked out of a tab of streaming toilet cams? It's greater than zero I assure you.

Don't forget diaper fetish communities.

But this is where the pearls are clutched hardest?

All executions should be public if not for transparency's sake.

Unfortunately they blew their wad back in 2020.

Here's one for Android Developer.

Must apply by snail mail.

If only they made a device (with an OS perhaps) where one could apply to such things electronically.

Nearly all these ads say "Send CVs to [email protected]" they aren't even trying to conceal what they're doing.

  s/American/British/
  s/European/Polish/

  s/American/Canadian/
  s/European/Indian/

You should take your ban as a badge of honor, for having upset the worst, most petty, worthless people on the Internet.

Then go outside and take a walk and watch the leaves change colors.

I wonder where this ranks in the top 5 stupidest things I've ever heard. It's bad enough merging customer databases when two companies merge.

No other major ISP has ever done this that I know of. Likely because it's completely unnecessary. Who made this decision (and why weren't they fired immediately)?

Because what I see is essentially "they're storing stolen property" but the burden of proof is on the author to prove it was, indeed, stolen.

I imagine the bar for that is pretty high otherwise anyone could weaponize DMCA to target their competitors' repositories.