pcnix
I could make the assertion that I'd be able to provide everything that Apple does, but with a much lower cut, but this can't be put to the test because there's no way for me to start another app store that iPhone users can access. I suspect a lot of the arguments for the 15% cut will change once we have alternate app stores offering the same things Apple does, but with a much lower cut. You'll then see app developers with skin in the game, and we'll know if everyone actually really thinks Apple does this better or if they'd rather have the extra money from other app stores.
A neat explainer for how this helps with Bayesian updates (which is the update in trust that you're describing) is here - https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/QGkYCwyC7wTDyt3yT/0-and-1-ar...
On top of that, You don't need massive k8s infra for any other framework either, so it isn't really a selling point for PHP itself.
```
=== START OF SMART DATA SECTION === SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED
SMART/Health Information (NVMe Log 0x02) Critical Warning: 0x00 Temperature: 42 Celsius Available Spare: 100% Available Spare Threshold: 99% Percentage Used: 23% Data Units Read: 439,149,863 [224 TB] Data Units Written: 407,143,345 [208 TB] Host Read Commands: 2,930,228,690 Host Write Commands: 1,777,317,283 Controller Busy Time: 0 Power Cycles: 103 Power On Hours: 1,691 Unsafe Shutdowns: 49 Media and Data Integrity Errors: 0 Error Information Log Entries: 0 ```
Ouch.
That is in fact exactly what the comment seems to suggest, in these lines.
> as opposed to when you were in your 20s (when the woman should be finding a potential husband
room500's response was exactly what I had in mind too, when I was reading the parent comment.
It very much feels like the GP had something specific in mind for "high-quality" that insinuates that caring for someone else's children is not a high quality thing to do.
I believe that quality is not what they are showing when they focus the comment on what women "should be doing", or if they're still seeing it as "someone else's kids".
We've built a tool to help measure speed with these sort of issues in mind - https://www.browserstack.com/blog/announcing-speedlab-test-w...
* Apple does not allow other App Stores on their platform
* Apple does not allow other payment processing or even instructions on where you can purchase things outside of their platform. This reduces even big players like Netflix to just throw up a message that says "You can only use this if you're a memeber", rather than give users a helpful link where they can purchase a membership outside the app.
Neither of these are things that Android does, so the case against Apple is significantly stronger.
That said though, it does do it's job for the most part.
This strikes at a slightly different problem, the latency of actually showing things on screen, but points out that not all is going well.
I was struck by how simple and effective an idea this was, and the clean implementation. Great work!
I really understand making the argument about privacy, , but Search is not the product to target here, it only seems to have gotten better these days, not worse.
In terms of the actual technology itself, it's very interestingly built, and as the poster above me mentioned, with a ton of caveats to the promises it makes.
As for the protest, the employee's right to protest is an important thing, and taking that away reduces you to an automaton. You'd be giving up the chance to hire great employees that have opinions of their own if you just want people that do what you ask. That puts you behind on innovation, and in the long term creates a very homogenous atmosphere that breeds complacency.