patrick-fitz
Re:Yi-Coder: A Small but Mighty LLM for Code
on Thursday September 05, 2024 @05:14PM (#41460463)
I'd be interested to see how it performs on https://www.swebench.com/
Using SWE-agent + Yi-Coder-9B-Chat.
Re:Show HN: Repaint – a WebGL based website builder
on Tuesday September 03, 2024 @06:25PM (#41439943)
Sorry, but the landing page is a bit dull. I think you need a video showing a live demo of the product.
Re:Qwen2 LLM Released
on Thursday June 06, 2024 @01:28PM (#40600098)
I think they should be a distinction between open-source and open-weight LLM's.
Re:Standard Ebooks' 1,000th title: Ulysses
on Friday May 31, 2024 @01:44PM (#40538124)
Thanks for the link, this does make it more approachable!
Re:Show HN: I made an AI-based domain name generator with availability...
on Thursday May 16, 2024 @04:11PM (#40382583)
When clicking on a .org domain, the website redirects me to a .org.uk domain on Namecheap.
Re:Meta.ai Oh My
on Tuesday April 23, 2024 @12:39AM (#40128567)
They have now added a disclaimer: "Messages are generated by AI and may be inaccurate or inappropriate."
Re:Meta.ai Oh My
on Friday April 19, 2024 @01:06PM (#40089319)
I think Meta.ai needs to add a disclaimer below the chat input box similar to ChatGPT:
"ChatGPT can make mistakes. Consider checking important information."
Re:Embeddings are a good starting point for the AI curious app developer
on Wednesday April 17, 2024 @02:03PM (#40068138)
Nice project! I find it can be hard to think of a idea that is well suited to use AI. Using embeddings for search is definitely a good option to start with.
Re:Llm.c – LLM training in simple, pure C/CUDA
on Monday April 08, 2024 @05:34PM (#39973964)
https://twitter.com/karpathy/status/1777427944971083809
> And once this is a in a bit more stable state: videos on building this in more detail and from scratch.
Looking forward to watching the videos.
Re:JetMoE: Reaching LLaMA2 performance with 0.1M dollars
on Thursday April 04, 2024 @05:09PM (#39935836)
Out of curiosity, looking at the cheapest price for a H100 that I could find online.
Lambda Reserved Cloud [1] starts at $1.89 per H100 per hour.
It could be possible to get the cost down to a lower amount:
$1.89 * 96GPUs * 24hours * 14days = ~$61k
Re:Andres Freund and the xz backdoor
on Wednesday April 03, 2024 @10:56PM (#39926076)
> (The New York Times has sued Microsoft and its partner OpenAI on claims of copyright infringement involving artificial intelligence systems that generate text.)
It's strange to see this included randomly in the middle of the article.
Re:Study: AI writing, illustration emits hundreds of times less carbon...
on Tuesday April 02, 2024 @03:44PM (#39910061)
"AI programming emits hundreds of times less carbon than humans" the same would also be true :0
Re:Write OpenAPI with TypeSpec
on Wednesday March 27, 2024 @05:48PM (#39845009)
This looks great, is there a converter to convert an OpenAPI yml file to TypeSpec?
Re:Introducing DBRX: A New State-of-the-Art Open LLM by Databricks
on Wednesday March 27, 2024 @05:36PM (#39844886)
Yes, there are using different wording in different articles:
https://www.databricks.com/blog/introducing-dbrx-new-state-a...
The only mention of open source is:
> DBRX outperforms established open source models
https://www.databricks.com/blog/announcing-dbrx-new-standard...
Open source is mentioned 10+ times
> Databricks is the only end-to-end platform to build high quality AI applications, and the release today of DBRX, the highest quality open source model to date, is an expression of that capability
https://github.com/databricks/dbrx
On Github it's described as an open license, not an open source license:
> DBRX is a large language model trained by Databricks, and made available under an open license.
Re:Introducing DBRX: A New State-of-the-Art Open LLM by Databricks
on Wednesday March 27, 2024 @12:26PM (#39841275)
Looking at the license restrictions: https://github.com/databricks/dbrx/blob/main/LICENSE
"If, on the DBRX version release date, the monthly active users of the products or services made available by or for Licensee, or Licensee’s affiliates, is greater than 700 million monthly active users in the preceding calendar month, you must request a license from Databricks, which we may grant to you in our sole discretion, and you are not authorized to exercise any of the rights under this Agreement unless or until Databricks otherwise expressly grants you such rights."
I'm glad to see they aren't calling it open source, unlike some LLM projects. Looking at you LLama 2.