password54321
password54321 on Hacker News
Achieving greater education for those that are disadvantaged is difficult, it is much easier to inflate grades and imagine you are making progress. Just another form of Goodhart's law playing out.
Edit: In all fairness, teaching in general is hard especially for a teacher in a public school, so I do also hold sympathy for them. And not all of them agree with the practices.
There is a famous image they show educators with the title "equity" and it shows the shorter person standing on more boxes than the larger so they are all standing at the same height. This is the current philosophy modern education is built on. They want everyone to reap the same rewards and it is seen as a failure, sometimes even "discrimination" if they don't as it can highlight the differences between certain demographics if they don't receive the same grades. If you speak against this you will likely be treated with hostility and swiftly pushed out (a few are more open minded). They reinforce their beliefs to themselves by coming up with award ceremonies that award anything that promotes "equity" without actually achieving greater education. Very cult-like behaviour.
Hi, flagger here. This is incoherent rambling and top comment pretty much highlights the problem. Posts should hold some substance.
Mind share is the true moat. It doesn't matter if your product is not special if when someone thinks "frontier" and "agentic development" they still think of Claude. They don't think Antigravity or Gemini while Google has also decided to safety max themselves into failing to gain more mind share.
It is like saying there is no impact on math because solving a millennium prize problem didn’t net them a profit. It is just a naive way of looking at things.
If a lot of jobs were still manufacturing jobs I would agree, but we are in a service economy that uses computers as the main tool. So I don't see how it won't come into effect fairly soon into other areas of work. You can't measure impact by profit alone so I don't find the article particularly interesting anyway.
"slowly change things in 20 years"
Yeah, it is not going to be slow. Progress compounds, everything is being built on top of fast computers and fast widespread internet connection. You are not at the beginning of the curve like you were in the 20th century when people didn't even know how to use a keyboard and we are already seeing widespread disruption in security.
>Why did you have to phrase it like this, instead of just bringing up your own counterpoint?
>What does this have to do with this? I'm not sure you understand the point being made..
Chris, buddy. We probably should not talk on this platform again. Have a great day!
It is not a rare take, this is from a 2007 video game: "Humans fail to see things as they truly are. They choose to see only what they wish. I acted only in support for this. A world filled with desires... viewed through a window, from which one sees what one wishes to see... Humans departed from reality at their own volition, craving more false images."
So AI holds the same beliefs as the final boss of a typical JRPG.
They certainly made a loss on this guy but it is far from "stupid" from a consumer perspective.
Treating anti-consumer practices as the "logical conclusion" while failing to give one is annoying. What you stated doesn't solve the fact that many people want to play games with others online, it is not just about assets.
Your "logical conclusion" ignores that many popular games rely on online content anyway. You still need their servers without needing it to be streamed.
The headline is completely misleading. There is no ban.
Posted by
password54321 on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @03:02PM
from the library.hbs.edu dept.
Posted by
password54321 on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @02:29PM
from the eurogamer.net dept.
Posted by
password54321 on Wednesday October 21, 2026 @02:28PM
from the reuters.com dept.
A lot of the costs are going to compute aka GPUs aka Nvidia. Guess who is funding AI startups so they can buy more GPUs.
Most training is post-training in modern AI (~90%). They are not memorising lets play videos, that is absurd.
Try and get an LLM to recite the entire first book of Harry Potter and it goes off track usually during chapter 2.
Just give them The 48 Laws of Power.
>good person
>good citizen
>make the world better
Could essentially be saying, obey and work. A lot of people won't agree that is the ideal life. If that's not how you interpreted it then you have my point.
The sort of slop they tell children. Adult world is far more complicated than that.
There is nothing special about the engineering behind React. Success simply compounds, if big company X does something everyone else must do it, which leads to more contributors, which leads to more visibility.
Posted by
password54321 on Tuesday October 20, 2026 @09:18AM
from the bbc.com dept.
The mistake in your analysis is that it is not just the far right but populism in general is on the rise, Mamdani, Green party in the UK etc.
The Nazis became popular during The Great Depression (which affected Germany) and we are seeing history repeat itself. Someone is now going to tell me we aren't in a recession because "number go up!" while everything around us tells us a different story.