part1of2

New account & misinformation?

> if you use this service PillPack and Amazon Employees have full access to your entire prescription history

That's not what the article you linked says

> Any prescription / healthcare info you give them will be sold back to SureScripts and used to sell you more garbage from Amazon ;)

That's not what the article you linked says

> Atlassian because they don’t take POs

To me that sounds like Atlassian is leaving a lot of money on the table

> because most people are driving the Web, and the only way to make the Web bearable is to load yourself up with huge toolchains.

Are you talking about browser app toolchains? If so, I disagree. HTML and CSS are all you need, with some vanilla JS. For example, HN users love the fact that it’s fast and responsive. It doesn’t use huge toolchains of React or whatever

Using huge tool chains is making the internet slower and more painful for devs & users.

But if you’re talking about dev tool chains for templating, I follow the “less is more” here too. Some templating tools can speed a dev up, but learning a dozen tools is really a waste of time

>> essentially free

Well Google is going to charge you $240 annually for a TB of storage now.

> Anil Sabharwal, Google Photos’ then-head, said in a blog post when the service launched in 2015. “And when we say a lifetime of memories, we really mean it.”

Most of Google’s product strategy has been bait & switch, and I saythat with all due to respect to the engineers. It’s the leaders who make these decisions

> This was the original ”fake news”.

No, that is a narrow view of history. The history of propaganda, yellow journalism, sensationalism and fake news has a long and storied history beyond today's talking heads

Some feedback: the 2 second splash thing before the webpage loads is an obtrusive experience to your users

Hosting yourself is better than Google reading and disabling your account because you used a couple words that might violate it's TOS. I can't imagine a researcher trying to write a book in Google Docs about 1960's civil rights without tripping Google's abuse engines. It is creepy

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2017/11/01/google-rea...

>> These lec­ture notes — in­clud­ing fig­ures — are made while at­tend­ing the lec­ture and have not been edit­ed af­ter­wards.

This is truly incredible to me.

You're drawing a conclusion that isn't there. The AG is not never said they reviewed Tether's books and it was indeed 1:1

I get it, thanks. Instead, Could you write about them, rather than the code? I'm picturing lessons learned, don't try ABC it's a waste of time, and so on..

> site’s anti-abuse systems, many of which Bell and Gackle have written themselves.

That sounds interesting! How were these built? In the same Arc language? Any chance this can be open sourced?

This is much more interesting than the title portrays. I didn't know what S3 was, but the implications are serious

This is what I came here to find. Thanks!

I read the post but didn’t understand why they had to walk. Why did they not get their $800k back?

0/5 stars : "delivery was late." are the reviews that really annoys me.

It becomes a tax dodge only when you renounce your US citizenship, which some millionaires have done already, such as Eduardo Saverin