News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

osm3000

Re:Write less code, be more responsible on Tuesday April 14, 2026 @04:57AM (#47763040)
I appreciate that. I am not a position though to advocate for such a change :)
Re:Write less code, be more responsible on Tuesday April 14, 2026 @04:56AM (#47763030)
Data Scientists
Re:Write less code, be more responsible on Tuesday April 14, 2026 @01:33AM (#47761632)
I am a machine learning engineer. I've been in the domain almost 12 years now (different titles and roles).

In my current role (and by no means that is unique), I don't know how to write less code.

Here are problems I am facing: - DS generating a lot of code - Managers who have therapy sessions with Gemini, and in which their ideas have been validated - No governance on DS (you want this package? import it) - No governance on Infrastructure (I spent a couple of months upskilling in a pipeline technology that were using: reading documentation and creating examples, until I became very good it...just for the whole tech to be ditched) - Libraries and tools that have been documentation, or too complex (GCP for example)

The cognitive overload is immense.

Back few years ago, when I was doing my PhD, immersing in PyTorch and Scipy stack had a huge return on investment. Now, I don't feel it.

So, how do I even write less code? Slowly, I am succumbing to the fact that my tools and methods are inappropriate. I am steadily shifting towards offloading this to Claude and its likings.

Is it introducing risks? For sure. It's going to be a disaster at one point. But I don't know what to do. Do I need a better abstraction? Different way to think about it? No clue

Re:Tiny improvement for SoA over AoS in Python on Sunday November 23, 2025 @04:09PM (#46027350)
I benchmarked SoA vs AoS in Python. While SoA was more efficient than AoS, its readability penalty outweighed the gains.

Happy to get some feedback about better ways to do this.

Re:Chernobyl: Debunking the Myths of the HBO Series on Thursday November 20, 2025 @01:21PM (#45995840)
It’s pretty good. I loved it. I recommend it

My only problem is that the creator insists it was factually correct. First test, the tapes, are anything but correct

Re:Chernobyl: Debunking the Myths of the HBO Series on Wednesday November 19, 2025 @09:55PM (#45988339)
Hey Nicolas! Very glad to hear from you :)

I honestly don't see a problem with dramatization (not my taste, but people are different I guess).

My issue is with Craig Mazin (the creator of the series) insistence that he stuck to the details and the truth in the series: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yY0r1Ln6tkM

Re:Chernobyl: Debunking the Myths of the HBO Series on Wednesday November 19, 2025 @09:51PM (#45988307)
I am not sure why you are mentioning historians here. A proper historical view/investigation is way outside of my scope.

My angle is simple: they said it was accurate, and Legasov did so and said that...and in his own words, he negated most of that.

Is Legasov a good guy? I don't know. Was he honest in what he said? I don't know...but he said what he said!

> cherry-pick inaccuracies

Feel free to go to the tapes

Re:Chernobyl: Debunking the Myths of the HBO Series on Wednesday November 19, 2025 @09:28PM (#45988147)
I wasn't aware of that Dyatlov's interview! Thanks a lot for sharing it
Re:Chernobyl: Debunking the Myths of the HBO Series on Wednesday November 19, 2025 @09:11PM (#45988031)
> because Legosov isn't even the primary source for the series

I think it was explicit that the series framed the tapes as the "revelation"; the honest message of a dying man to the world to expose what actually happened

Re:Chernobyl: Debunking the Myths of the HBO Series on Wednesday November 19, 2025 @09:07PM (#45987989)
That is a very good point

My angle was: HBO series said Legasov's position was something that was by far not true

Re:Chernobyl: Debunking the Myths of the HBO Series on Wednesday November 19, 2025 @09:03PM (#45987950)
I've mentioned her article. I think she barely touched the topic of Chernobyl itself. Her points was about what the Soviet life was back then, and some depictions of this was incorrect.

For example (for her article)

> In Episode 2, for example, the Central Committee member Boris Shcherbina (Stellan Skarsgård) threatens to have Legasov shot if he doesn’t tell him how a nuclear reactor works. There are a lot of people throughout the series who appear to act out of fear of being shot. This is inaccurate: summary executions, or even delayed executions on orders of a single apparatchik, were not a feature of Soviet life after the nineteen-thirties. By and large, Soviet people did what they were told without being threatened with guns or any punishment.

Her point was: this is not the Soviet way back then. My point is: these two people barely interacted directly, and one of them at least (Legasov) had a lot of respect for the other from the very beginning

Re:Chernobyl: Debunking the Myths of the HBO Series on Wednesday November 19, 2025 @08:50PM (#45987848)
I would have accepted that if it wasn't for Craig Mazin (the creator of the series) insistence that he stuck to the details and the truth in the series:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yY0r1Ln6tkM

For the life of me I couldn't figure out what truth he is talking about (other than that Chernobyl happened, and some characters existed)

Re:Chernobyl: Debunking the Myths of the HBO Series on Wednesday November 19, 2025 @08:43PM (#45987785)
> It seems the main faults that OP finds in the show are that Legasov had issues with his government, when in "reality" he thought they were great. But is that "reality," or oppression?

The tapes were framed in the HBO as an honest message of a dying man to the world to expose the lies that happened. Well, after Going through the tapes, I couldn't find any indication of that...only the opposite.

Now I concede that I don't really know what actually happened, and one can't put a price on the intensity of the situation for everyone at that time.

My point is simple: HBO series said Legasov's position was something that wasn't true

Re:A raw pptx file content reader on Tuesday November 18, 2025 @05:58AM (#45963575)
That was pretty dope! I love the idea of developing a tool a mid-step to developing another tool.

On a different note: I didn't get though the reason for the need to have an in-browser PPTX viewer. Can you elaborate more on the use case?

Re:Learn Prolog Now on Wednesday November 12, 2025 @02:08PM (#45904617)
I studied prolog back in 2014. It was used in AI course. I found it very confusing: trying to code A*, N-Queens, or anything in it was just too much. Python, in contrast, was a god-send. I failed the subject twice in my MSc (luckily passing the MSc was based on the total average), but did a similar course in UC Berkeley, with python: aced it, loved it, and learned a lot.

Never again :D

Re:Ask HN: What Are You Working On? (Nov 2025) on Sunday November 09, 2025 @04:27PM (#45869338)
I am learning Godot engine, going through the list of 20 games in order to build up my experience https://20_games_challenge.gitlab.io/

I am almost done with flappy bird (2nd challenge)

Why? I love the old arcade and game boy games, and I want to recreate them to my liking. I also love mechanical systems and space rovers, and I want ro build worlds to explore and simulate these things

Re: on Thursday November 06, 2025 @05:27PM (#45841291)
A shoutout through the time, to those friends that went away, for the good and bad times
Because I mainly work with python, I am using Kivy (https://kivy.org/).

Earlier I was HTMX, Jinja templates, Flask, Tailwind and little vanilla JS. It was too inelegant for my taste.

I am considering moving to either Swift, or JS/Svelete

Show HN: Reimplementation of Lazy Tetris (Python)

https://github.com/osm3000/Lazy-Tetris

Demo video: https://youtu.be/ZoQ6w73rbkYSomeone first implemented something like this and shared it on HN https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44103839...and I love it :DUnfortunately, they removed it later (no idea why). So I decided to make my own implementation.Key features: - The pieces are selected at random, unlike the true Tetris, which uses Multi bag sampling. VERY interesting dynamic....

( Read More... | no comments | on HN )
Re:Benchmarking Matrix Multiplication on CPUs on Tuesday June 10, 2025 @01:53AM (#44233042)
I am working on RL (with evolutionary algorithms) and artificial life, and I am trying to find the right setup (software, hardware) to accelerate my experiments. This benchmark is a step to illuminate the search space for me. Happy to hear your thoughts
Re:Show HN: Lazy Tetris on Tuesday May 27, 2025 @08:54AM (#44106483)
Gosh this awesome! Thank you! That put a huge smile on my face ♥
I just read it in the referenced book section from the parent comment. It shocked the imaginary bubble where my mind is a bit. I want to reflect more on it.

Somehow, in the midset of all these LLM and diffusion models, the only thing that seems to catch attention is creativity. I've not thought of experience.

Re:ToS;DR on Monday March 31, 2025 @12:35PM (#43536939)
Why Tor is graded C, even though there are no downsides?
Re:"The kebab and the French train station": another view on Sunday March 09, 2025 @02:43PM (#43312272)
Of course humor :D

It was just cool to see it as the one odd point :)

Older »