onoj
Believing Everyone Else Is Wrong Is a Danger Sign
European Parliament Approves Controversial “Meme Ban”
(2010) Things I Won’t Work With: Dioxygen Difluoride
In Defence of Hate
"Laudisi et al. (2012) used a different exposure system, that of Ardoino et al. (2005) where the vast majority of the exposure is produced from reflections off a long cylindrical surface in a TEM cell, where the curvature of the cylinder will also produce a largely non-polarized EMF and different reverberation paths and consequent destructive interference, may both be expected to occur. Consequently the predicted low biological activity of EMFs produced by the Wu et al. (2009) system may be expected to also occur from this TEM exposure system Ardoino et al. (2005). It is not possible to study biological effects of EMFs from Wi-Fi, cell phones or any other important exposures using such exposure systems because of the polarization changes they produce from the original polarized EMFs and because of destructive interference."
This article states that many previous studies tested: (from the article)
It uses a large chamber surrounded by 1 mm aluminum mesh wire mesh to provide reflections of the EMFs. The chamber in which animals are exposed on a platform at its center, is also surrounded by antennae in all 6 directions (up, down, all four horizontal directions) such that each antenna is broadcasting with one polarization is opposed (at 180°) by another broadcasting with the 180° opposite polarization, as well as by four other antennae, broadcasting with 90° different polarization in each of the four possible directions. This produces a field that is more like a non-polarized EMF rather than the usual polarized artificial EMF"
is this a fair test of modulated polarized Wi-Fi?
Wi-Fi is an important threat to human health
https://trydesignlab.com/blog/great-design-thinking-tim-brow...
Nothing at all to do with a professional design process however.
Looking Busy: The rise of pointless work
The Forgotten Legend of Silicon Valley’s Flying Saucer Man
Acrobatic geckos can even race on water’s surface
Australian government making new legislation to undermine end-to-end encryption
A Longitudinal Analysis of Union Decline and Wage Inequality, 1973–2015
Could a neuroscientist understand a microprocessor? [pdf]
The Case of Verge Genomics
Astrophysicists try to falsify multiverse, find they can’t
Platinum-gold alloy believed to be the most wear-resistant metal in the world
2001 Levi Smart Jacket – Old New Wearables [pdf]
Efficient Fuzzy Bayesian Inference Algorithms for Incorporating Expert Knowledge
That is a very different impact than the majority of the other awards.
(edited typos)
It was not established by Mr. Nobel, the name was taken. The family does not acknowledge it. To me this is disrespectful to the man who set up the prize in his name.
http://www.alternet.org/economy/there-no-nobel-prize-economi...
if your orders double from 20K units to 40K, your costs will roughly double, usually meaning that any profit made on the 20K is re-invested to make the 40K - usually plus additional capital.
So long as your production quantities double, you will not actually "have" any money (unless your FOB cost is north of four times sell price). Many companies cannot "realise" profit until orders stabilise.
2) International work camps for peace - fully volunteer organization and you get to see another country in a real way and do good work while doing so.
Both are 100% - 100% direct.