omerh

I did almost exactly the same yesterday.

https://blog.omerh.me/post/2019/05/17/first_post/

My default search engine for more than a year. Mobile and desktop, rarely I use !g bang.

Also, dns are 1.1.1.1 / 1.1.0.0 Browsers are ff and safari. Email is ProtonMail.

Did a complete refactor to do it more efficiently

Did some refactoring :) thanks for noticing ... It's now far more efficient from a small test I've did

A Tiny container to watch other containers on a docker host, once the other containers exits, gowatcher will terminate and reduce autoscaling group count

Sorry for the typos. Operational wise

There is an RFC for using www

With www Optional wize: easy dns handling and wildcard ssl will serve any other future sub domain dns. Seo wise: google prefers it And if I’m not mistaken there and rfc for it. I can look later

I’m using ProtonMail with the free plan for more than 6 month now, still have some husk from Gmail being auto fowrorded to it. And for work I use gsuite for now.

ProtonMail only did one thing wrong lately. They’ve added a payers feature a @pm.me short domain and allowing for the free users to only receive emails with this address. That was irritating and absurd, so I’m still thing if I want to move to move completely.

Fastmail recycling makes them irrelevant.

I moved to the free version of protonmail. Having my gmail fw all emails to this account.

It was this or managing my own mail server. For now I’m happy with thier service and their privacy policy of course. But, it’s not gmail or even close to it feature wise.

Easy way to terminate instance from within it. Making sure you are terminating the right one without autosclae policies

For multiple layers in a Dockerfile use overlayfs2 and not aufs. You will suffer from slow io

I Got a lot of requests for creating a standalone replica set for Dev machines.

Yes, Netapp does CIFS alot better than the rest. But you can always setup a File server cluster and run it on any storage you want. A bit of a hassle on setup but there is an alternative.

I agree, I had to chase them for more than 2 weeks to get a disk shelf quote which was overpriced around $3k competing with a local vendor that buys from them. I bought from a vendor and not directly from Netapp

Running on premis VMWare (but sadly my Netapp isn't that fast FAS2240)

got the price a bit wrong sorry. I use at my company S3 at 3c per GB

and I am starting to try out Google Cloud Storage, I think that they out preforms AWS

All I can say is that I am moving everything I can to cloud object storage from my Netapp because of 2 cents vs. $2 for GB of storage. Also Netapp wouldn't be my third chios on the next purchase of storage