News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

omarelamri

It's already way past 11pm EST.
I feel guilty for posting this, because these new devices have NO HealthKit integration. That's a deal breaker for me and a ton of others!
Re:Angular 2 Core on Saturday October 25, 2014 @08:00PM (#8509824)
So is this basically TypeScript with annotations and types available at runtime?
Re:Inside the World's Most Humane Prison on Saturday October 25, 2014 @12:02PM (#8508535)
This place is way better designed and equipped than most startup cowering spaces!
Re:Angular 2 Core on Saturday October 25, 2014 @11:48AM (#8508510)
Yeah, it definitely is EcmaScript 6. They've added the "class" and "constructor" keywords. Typescript is very mush modeled after EcmaScript 6 anyways, so technically it can be both. But I'm sure it's EcmaScript6, because that's what Angular 2 is written in.
Re:A Print Magazine for Hackers on Saturday October 25, 2014 @11:42AM (#8508488)
This almost sounds like an oxymoron.
Re:Angular 2 Core on Saturday October 25, 2014 @11:38AM (#8508474)
I agree. There is virtually no way you can smoothly upgrade an Angular 1 project to this. You'd have to redo most of it from scratch. There are a lot of huge projects that are built on Angular 1 -- many enterprise products too. And this is a huge blow to maintenance. It might be a reason for a lot of people dropping Angular and going for something that makes more business sense. Maybe it's React's time to shine.
Re:Angular 2 Core on Saturday October 25, 2014 @11:30AM (#8508454)
Is he using TypeScript or ECMAScript 6? Also, is it just me, to does this seem like a completely different framework than Angular 1?
Re:5 things you didn’t know were possible with JavaScript on Friday October 24, 2014 @05:26PM (#8506087)
I think this is what he's trying to do with the Google Maps thing: http://www.html5rocks.com/en/tutorials/geolocation/trip_mete...

I think he's talking about the navigator.geolocation object.

It's an acqui-hire; they want to build the most talented team so that they can develop the best smart-home devices. They're going head-to-head against Apple, but with a very different strategy. Apple is trying to build the best mobile devices and the best SDK to create a huge market and a great dev environment for developers to build devices for HomeKit. Google's strategy seems to be to build their own great smart home devices.
That's a viable reason. But I think they're mainly doing that because Tony Fadell is in charge of Google's whole smart home operation, so Nest has to remain the overarching brand.
Re:Inbox is a reinvention of email from Google on Friday October 24, 2014 @03:57PM (#8505614)
How can Mailbox compete against this then?
Re:Inbox by Gmail on Wednesday October 22, 2014 @01:45PM (#8493933)
This is a lot like what @paulg was talking about on his "Frighteningly Ambitious Startup Ideas" essay when he talks about replacing email: http://www.paulgraham.com/ambitious.html
Re:What it took for SpaceX to become a serious space company on Wednesday October 22, 2014 @01:31PM (#8493834)
Do you know of any experiment where machine learning was applied to building an algorithm that learned anaphora resolution based on a human generated training set. I'd love to read any articles/papers you have on this. Thanks!
Re:Inbox is a reinvention of email from Google on Wednesday October 22, 2014 @01:27PM (#8493807)
How does this compare to Mailbox from Dropbox?
Re:Kevin Systrom: From Stanford to Startup on Tuesday October 21, 2014 @12:01PM (#8487987)
This was right before they launched their iPhone app and got acquired.

Older »