offtheisland
Re:Richard M. Stallman resigns
on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @01:05AM (#20991772)
The benign explanation is that he didn't know Epstein was a monster (few outside the DA's office did until 2018) and that he accepted funding for AI research.
Re:Richard M. Stallman resigns
on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @01:03AM (#20991765)
It's also unjust to say that he was accused of assaulting one of Epstein's victims, when the only accusations are from people who inferred from "she was sent to Minsky's room" that "he said yes".
Re:Richard M. Stallman resigns
on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @01:01AM (#20991748)
>With all that in mind, I'm dubious that Minsky could have been approached by a young woman and not had some degree of mens rea. At the very least, Minsky must have assumed the woman was a paid sex worker and recognized at least some possibility that she was trafficked and/or underage. I can't abide the notion that a old man would have mistaken the invitations of an uneducated young girl as genuine attraction.
Lots of famous men of all ages are approached by groupies. Some accept their advances, some don't. I've never heard of any of them reporting the fact to the authorities.
Re:Richard M. Stallman resigns
on Tuesday September 17, 2019 @01:00AM (#20991736)
>If Minsky were tried in US, he would be convicted. Ignorance is not a defense.
He would be convicted if he had sex with her. The evidence that he had sex with her is that she was sent to his room and he didn't report that to the authorities. That doesn't seem overwhelmingly persuasive.