obiefernandez
You're Already a Meat Proxy
Relationship Engineering: the fifth phase of building with AI
Thinking Machines: Model with simultaneous talking, listening, thinking, tools
Show HN: Manceps – Ruby Client for the Model Context Protocol (MCP)
https://github.com/zarpay/manceps
I built this because existing Ruby options for MCP either don't handle persistent connections properly (MCP servers bind sessions to TCP connections) or couple you to a specific LLM framework.Manceps is a pure protocol client. Two transports (Streamable HTTP and stdio), built-in auth (bearer, API key, experimental OAuth 2.1 with PKCE), and full 2025-11-25 spec support including protocol...
It's the only way to actually encourage high-agency, high-ownership behavior. Working from a backlog is actively counterproductive!
Levels of 5-MeO-DMT
Cursor caught stealing Kimi's model calling it their own, again
Enclave gem: Mega useful if you're building agents on Ruby on Rails
I have lots of the code proven out already https://medium.com/zar-engineering/code-mode-mcp-ac17c2a1038...
It might be time to say goodbye to HTML inputs
Code Mode MCP: Practical application example with immediate benefits
All state changes are made with MCP so it saved me from having to spend time on any forms and most interactions other than filtering searching sorting etc.
Means we will be ditching Linear soon.
I know I’m an outlier but this sort of thing will get more common.
Your Company's 3-Year AI Strategy Is a 3-Year Death Sentence
Agents as Teammates
The Monorepo Made Me a Real Engineer Again
Tell HN: Anthropic is down (Sonnet 5 imminent?)
I told Claude to build an executive assistant. This is what work looks like now
Building an ECS Golden Path with Claude Code and AWS CDK
Me and the Machine
My Full Supplement Stack for 2026 (including research peptides)
What Used to Take Months Now Takes Days
Like it's probably a good thing for humanity if the USA does not feel the need to go to war with China over Taiwan.
What 50 Milliseconds Feels Like, ADHD involves a faster internal clock
The split between main model tokens and sub-LLM tokens is clever for cost and context rot, but it also hides the true economic story. For many users the cost that matters is total tokens across all calls, not just the controller’s context. Some of your plots celebrate higher “main model token efficiency” while total tokens rise substantially. Do you have scenarios where RLM is strictly more cost-efficient at equal or better quality, or is the current regime basically “pay more total tokens to get around context limits”?
math-python is the most damning data point: same capabilities, but the RLM harness makes models worse and slower. That feels like a warning that “more flexible scaffold” is not automatically a win; you’re introducing an extra layer of indirection that the model has not been optimized for. The claim that RL training over the RLM will fix this is plausible, but also unfalsifiable until you actually show a model that beats a strong plain-tool baseline on math with less wall-clock and tokens.
Oolong and verbatim-copy are more encouraging: the controller treating large inputs as opaque blobs and then using Python + sub-LLMs to scan/aggregate is exactly the kind of pattern humans write by hand in agents today. One thing I’d love to see is a comparison vs a well-engineered non-RL agent baseline that does essentially the same thing but with hand-written heuristics (chunk + batch + regex/SQL/etc.). Right now the RLM looks like a principled way to let the model learn those heuristics, but the post doesn’t really separate “benefit from architecture” vs “benefit from just having more structure/tools than a vanilla single call.”
On safety / robustness: giving the model a persistent Python REPL and arbitrary pip is powerful, but it also dramatically expands the attack surface if this ever runs on untrusted inputs. Are you treating RLM as strictly a research/eval harness, or do you envision this being exposed in production agent systems? If the latter, sandboxing guarantees and resource controls probably matter as much as reward curves.