nvegater

A lot of haters in the comments, but I think it’s a bit too much negativity.

It’s true that they could focus on polishing the edit experience, but given that I rarely code anymore by hand, I have some doubts that it’s future proof to do that.

I think is not a bad bet trying to innovate in the LLM-coding space. Looking forward to try deltaDB and I hope it works outside of Zed !

how is this related to better auth ? In my understanding, keycloak and better auth are fundamentally different. I would compare keycloak more with Ory for example.

Thank you ! I actually think real time weight update is theoretically possible while also avoiding messing up the network. Would be super useful if we figure out how to do that. That would enhance LLMs closer to real intelligence if we follow Sutton’s definition

Yes, and there is one trick I’ve learned instead of explicitly pulling the ‘I’m the lead’ card (which is valid, but not always the best move).

Present the decision in terms of its consequences — consequences that fall on you as the leader, not on others. You want to make clear that the accountability for the outcome rest with you and that others are "safe".

What usually happens when I do this is that the team defers to me to make the decision cause they recognize my point.

That way, you preserve alignment and authority without eroding trust, because the team sees it’s not about wielding power, but about owning the consequences no one else should or can carry.

I want to start writing again. Maybe someone finds it interesting. Happy to hear your thoughts (good or bad ones).

I see this as oversimplification. US Tech faces hard regulations too (fintech, healthcare etc...). Also Regulation is not that big of a bump in EU. GDPR simplified rules across 27 different national laws and forced new innovations in privacy. Also Spotify, SAP, Adyen all started in small markets, as counterexamples. The main reasons why USA is ahead I think are the historical advantages (internet, personal computer), the network effects created by the historical advantages and the VC ecosystem. Also the culture for risk tolerance.

Humans experience the world as a story, but that is not necessarily the most human way to wrap a life around as you are implying. In some cases there are more powerful frameworks. For example Hitler is wrapped (by most of the world at least) around the damage and pain he caused not around his story. Stories are mostly fine, but thinking that we should strive for that to being the main perspective is limiting.

Ok then the parent is talking about those situations (forms and user editable fields) not about state in general in the library, correct ? If that’s the case, weird comparison.

> In Vue you can just change a property deep inside the model layer and the view updates

I never used vue for production apps, but my feeling tells me this could be a problem when the app becomes big. If you change a prop deep inside the model layer the chances of triggering an unintentional view update are higher? By using setters, you're essentially creating a more structured and controlled way of updating your application's state. But I have the react googles on, maybe I am missing something :)

A lot of People in “colder” countries with higher purchasing power (specially in Europe) still want to move to Barcelona now that they can work remotely. I wonder how this fact affects the prices compared to tourism apartments.

The build times for react are not a problem at all.

I honestly don’t understand how’s this different from react server components with nextjs but with less features? It seems like the same thing but with an even clearer border between server/client components and therefore missing all the optimizations (like streaming). Like islands architecture but made out of different technologies, is my understanding correct ? I would appreciate some feedback :)

It looks like a shorter and more specific syntax for things you can already do with vanilla stuff. In theory more tricky but faster to develop for one person (something like tailwind for JS). I find tailwind makes me develop faster than css but is a bit more tricky to get started on existing tailwind components than in just CSS components.

The defaults are opinionated but also minimalistic, I like this! Props on the simplicity!

Maybe something like a distributed DB where each different browser is a DB to sync with the other Browsers/Db’s ? I know this can be achievable with Tauri (a standalone app) and gunjs in a relatively straightforward way

This looks very nice ! How would you compare it with slatejs, tiptap or lexical ? Is this only for layouts but not for content ? (Would it be very hard to include some rich text and make it work like a cms with rich text editing?)

Good point. As non native speaker I thought reach was related to a quantity but that was wrong. Thanks for the clarification.