nop
Just because you are rich it doesn't mean you get everything you point at and even still it's quite satisfying for any young person to know hes earned something.
I on the other hand come from the lower classes, pretty much as low as it gets in Sweden and I've never felt the need to have a summer job because of income.
I wonder how that relates to what type of school University of Virginia is as I know nothing about it. It would be interesting to see how that compares to Stanford, MIT and the like.
Silverlight or not I think most of will live without all the secret knowledge contained in those videos unless we want to fork out a $600 tuition fee to see more than three of them according to: http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2009/05/20/stanford-videos-...
Then there's the whole case with the tsunami tapes going missing.
The case with bodströms possibly advocating direct control of the police to raid TPBs hosting company.
I remember a whole array of ministers getting kicked out head first because of various visits to strip clubs in the 90's.
Then you've got Mona Sahlin cheating on her taxes as well as a wide array of scandals with Gudrun Schyman and alcohol.
That's just the things I can remember on the top of my head and I have just about barely payed attention to local news for the last couple of years until recently.
I think that we might be less sensationalist and have a shorter memory but we do have plenty of scandals. You have to realize though that we are only made up of 9 million people, their scandals should be both greater size and of greater numbers.
As for the two opinions thing, Americans are much more extrovert than Sweeds are. They like to yell at things, it's their thing. We like to sit and whine about things, that's our thing. I do think however that our politicians don't blatantly lie as much, our minister of finance isn't standing there telling us everything is great when it's obvious we hurting and going down deeper.
Now I happened to find Swedish media pretty boring, but that's another thing entirely.
Chrome/XP.
I've been fairly happy with the clothes I've bought by mail order though, there's been a few snags sure but you can send them back and it tends to be cheaper. I do go to the store sometimes, especially for jeans as it's hard to find pairs that fit me since I've got skinny long legs.
As for the skin color thing, I can honestly say that I have no idea whatsoever on how to judge that.
They don't have to check 1.7 million users to see if they have @replies on, if they maintain a list with "@reply subscribers", there's little overhead as far as I can see. If a something rarely changes but is checked a lot, it's a pretty good idea to have it pre-calculated.
Edited: "No overhead", was a bit to absolute thanks jpwagner.
Re-Edited: Oh look there was a commenting feature on the blog, was pretty hard to find.
http://shirt.woot.com is nice for T's at least but I don't think it would work well for anything more expensive or less expressive than that.
The problem as so many people have pointed out and I agree with is that funny comments at the root aren't intellectually valuable. One of the problems with making funny comments at root (beyond that they are just useless) is that I think people like me don't always read the article before the comments so they don't have much of a context. I can skip a thread by jumping to the next root comment if the thread is uninteresting, but I can't skip a root comment and they offer more context buildup to make funny remarks in.
Now don't get me wrong I love humor but I think it's better served within the context of slashdot, reddit, digg and so on.
To the commenter: There's an easy way of saying you found something interesting; vote it up.
EDIT: Oh, I completely failed to consider that it was sarcasm, thanks for pointing that out. I did notice the commenter only had 5 karma and figured he was just new but yeah sarcasm seems more likely.
I don't procrastinate because I don't care, I procrastinate because there are multiple things I care about. A few of those happens to be playing games, reading hacker news, having a god awful many feeds in my newsreader, drinking beer and having more then one project at any time. Although I have the personality type that does things at the end of a deadline and I know people who aren't like that think of us as lazy and unstructured but it's not like that at all. I found this to be extremely insightful once: http://www.structuredprocrastination.com/
I also doubt there are many (if any) that has a job that's interesting all the time. :)
My to-read folder on this computer has 248 pdfs in it most of which are academic papers a few (maybe 10 or so) are books. Even a 500 page imagescan of a book is 63 megs.
I found a bibliography of cryptography on a university page (I think it was MIT or Berkley) a while back which was 700mb over about 2 728 pdfs large.
I wouldn't be so worried about 1GB, the amount of dead trees you can fit on there will keep you busy for months. Unless I guess you want to have massive amounts of audio books but then I'd wonder why you wouldn't just get an iPod instead.
(Hes got various versions attributed to him)
Also the €2.7 million in fines is unheardof as we don't do punative damages in Sweden (now you might think that's absurd but that's an issue on it's own). The verdict is also about accessory to spreading a handful of copyrighted material and not about the site in general.
Then there's the whole issue with the judge possibly being biased, the police investigating the case getting a job at the movie industry, an entity in the European Union announcing its support for a verdict against TPB, the plaintiffs lawyers knowing the verdict long before anyone else including the accused did, the original raid on TPB took all the servers the webhost had (which was a lot) not just TPB servers and I don't think they ever got to the bottom of if our old minister of justice Thomas Bodström had told the police to perform the raid to begin with (it's highly illegal for a minister to directly order or otherwise use his influence).
I happened to think what TPB is doing isn't illegal however I'm not a lawyer and I do place my trust in the Swedish legal system, so if the case is found to be illegal in the last instance it can appeal to then obviously it is. It would be nice however if this whole thing didn't ooze of corruption so much it's disgusting.
In Sweden there are laws that if you transfer money to someone by accident they are required to return it and this is a Swedish bank account and a Swedish law firm. I have no idea if those laws would actually apply in this case though, seeing how I'm not a lawyer or anything.
On a related note it's nice to know those laws exist when you accidently pay the rent to your webbhost.
Even if it was a scam the scammer would essentially make himself loose money by the nature of the action.
Maybe if this action was targeted at the plaintiffs rather than the law firm I'd think differently but it's destructive to punish those who choose to represent those we don't agree with.
I just can't shake the feeling it's wrong, I don't like it.