News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

nirvanatikku

talk about 30 seconds to wow. great app, UX and demo. would love to use this. kudos.
Re:Stop Building AI Tools Backwards on Wednesday July 23, 2025 @12:04PM (#44660743)
I find we're all missing the forest for the trees. We're using AI in spots.

AI requires a holistic revision. When the OS's catch up, we'll have some real fun.

The author is good to call out the differences in UX. Sad that design has always been given less attention.

When I first saw the title, my initial thought was this may relate to AX, which I think compliments the topic very well: https://x.com/gregisenberg/status/1947693459147526179

Re:Nobody Knows How to Build with AI Yet on Saturday July 19, 2025 @12:16PM (#44616774)
This article is spot on.

I had stumbled upon Kidlin’s Law—“If you can write down the problem clearly, you’re halfway to solving it”.

This is a powerful guiding principle in today’s AI-driven world. As natural language becomes our primary interface with technology, clearly articulating challenges not only enhances our communication but also maximizes the potential of AI.

The async approach to coding has been most fascinating, too.

I will add, I've been using Repl.it *a lot*, and it takes everything to another level. Getting to focus on problem solving, and less futzing with hosting (granted it is easy in the early journey of a product) - is an absolute game changer. Sparking joy.

I personally use the analogy of mario kart mushroom or star; that's how I feel using these tools. It's funny though, because when it goes off the rails, it really goes off the rails lol. It's also sometimes necessary to intercept decisions it will take.. babysitting can take a toll (because of the speed of execution).

Re:1-800-ChatGPT on Wednesday December 18, 2024 @04:57PM (#42455867)
While true... real world wins?
Re:1-800-ChatGPT on Wednesday December 18, 2024 @02:47PM (#42454242)
telephony* voice data

[*] limited bandwidth (8 kHz), providing a valuable opportunity to enhance and specialize models for telephony applications, ensuring better performance and user experience even with low-fidelity audio inputs.

Re:1-800-ChatGPT on Wednesday December 18, 2024 @02:39PM (#42454118)
Agreed on the broader use of data. That said, it’s not just about phoneme collection—different channels and UX modalities reach different audiences and contexts. Each channel ultimately delivers unique inputs, fueling more specialized and robust models tailored to those specific use cases.
Re:EmojifyIt – AI Powered Text to Emoji on Wednesday August 21, 2024 @05:51PM (#41314539)
Discover EmojifyIt: a playful AI tool that transforms text into a universal language of emojis. It's a fun, creative way to see how AI visualizes meaning, making communication more expressive and boundary-free.
Re:Show HN: gpudeploy.com – "Airbnb" for GPUs on Sunday May 05, 2024 @12:32AM (#40262261)
Fiat proxied through USDC - a stablecoin offered by [Circle](https://www.circle.com/en/usdc).
Re:Show HN: gpudeploy.com – "Airbnb" for GPUs on Saturday May 04, 2024 @07:40PM (#40261194)
Great idea and wishing you the best of luck!

Dropping a note that I've found https://akash.network/ ~ https://akash.network/gpus/ to be impressive, as typically with crypto projects it's all scams, however in this instance there's demand and legit usage. https://stats.akash.network/

Something to consider!

Re: taking issue with my statement on privilege -- I'm thoroughly confused by your comment "privilege .. [is] something one is given and gives." Male privilege is an inherent trait. It is up to us to become aware of it and not perpetuate it's consequences in our industry.

Not sure what you mean by "we've all already come to the conclusion that equality of opportunity is a privilege we all would benefit from".. equal opportunity is not a privilege - it's a baseline.

How can you genuinely say that everyone is "in some way privileged"? The whole idea of privilege is that only few have it, especially in the context we're talking about. I can think of so many marginalized groups in society that enjoy no privilege whatsoever.

Lastly, re: "we would simply be repeating history", please shed light on this, I don't really get it.

"because of something they can't control" is a dangerous point to me; while I may not be able to change or "control" the fact that I am male, I can certainly gain awareness of my male privilege and behave in a way that does not perpetuate it.

So going to back to the original poster, had he been aware of this privilege he would not make statements about reverse discrimination or some injustice being perpetuated against him or other men due to policies that support women's equal participation in our industry.

I didn't say that semantics were unimportant overall, I'm implying that its erroneous to assert that there's discrimination at play against men in this context because to imply so, supports the stale argument that policies favoring equal gender representation discriminate against men.
It's bizarre that from my response you had to get into semantics, which completely misses the point.

It's not about dictionary definitions of words, it's about how discrimination manifests (or how it cannot in the hands of those who don't hold power). Surely we can debate what discrimination means, but there's a plethora of sociological literature on the intersection of that dictionary definition (that you referenced) and how it comes to fruition in the hands of dominant groups. This is obviously central to this discussion as it was implied that there was somehow reverse discrimination against men.

Please share what you think about that, genuinely curious.

Pretty sure you are.

Do you have no understanding of what discrimination is? Discrimination is perpetuated by those who hold power - it is completely and directly proportional to dominance - those who do not hold power cannot discriminate.

You know why? Because if you don't have power, your ideas do not come into implementation (you don't have resources!).

Therefore, a dominant group i.e. men or white people, cannot be discriminated against because they are the centre of power - they are the arbiters.

This BS of reverse sexism that you are perpetuating is complete nonsense with absolutely zero sociological backing. Therefore, the men you reference were not "discriminated" against.

In fact, your reference to "normal people" shows how un-nuanced you are in your understanding of discrimination and society in general.

Also, the fact that you expect a diversity of ideas from a homogenous group of people is absurd - unique ideas come through because people have unique backgrounds and experiences - as these in turn act as frameworks for their intellectual products.

Has it ever occurred to you that having people with "diverse" "skin" and "sexual orientation" could actually contribute to your goal of having diverse ideas?

Don't cite one conference as proof for why men are discriminated against. Do you know who was part of the blind review process? and more importantly, does that selection reflect on the quality of scholarship put forth by female candidates or is it the product of the experiences of the people sitting on the panel?

Re:Build your own Jarvis on Monday January 04, 2016 @09:50AM (#10835846)
I won't comment on the "best" here as they all have their respective differences, but consider signing up for the Nuance Mix developer platform Beta: https://developer.nuance.com/mix ; we're offering full control custom ASR+NLU.
Re:Why “Agile” and Especially Scrum Are Terrible on Tuesday August 18, 2015 @06:55PM (#10082748)
Totally fair, and agreed on the value of such a discussion; Same deal - seen/lived both. It requires fundamental cultural change (PM plays a big part). When the discussion starts with teams engaging in poorly defined scrum, I usually reference: https://www.scrum.org/ScrumBut.
Re:Why “Agile” and Especially Scrum Are Terrible on Tuesday August 18, 2015 @06:45PM (#10082704)
The rate this post is getting upvotes suggests that agile (and particularly scrum) are indeed misunderstood. Eesh :/
Re:Jarvis: Personal assistant via SMS on Sunday July 27, 2014 @08:32PM (#8094498)
the screenshot they put on the homepage suggests that it does interface with iMessage?
Re:Jarvis: Personal assistant via SMS on Sunday July 27, 2014 @08:29PM (#8094488)
I can't seem to validate '100$/month'. Do I have to sign up in order to see that info?
Re:Looks by Dr. Dre on Wednesday July 09, 2014 @05:49PM (#8012434)
@moskie - it is indeed amazing, and it's part of their engine that makes them truly unique (that it has been this way for so long, and continues to be just as talked about).

@k-mcgrady: true, but if you look at what percentage of their cash they spent on it, it's not as significant as acquisitions from other, similarly sized companies.. but your point remains: it is out of the ordinary for $aapl.

Re:I wish AirBnb was never born on Tuesday June 24, 2014 @10:05PM (#7941871)
"Plus, job market you know, fuck motherfucking H1Bs." ?
Re:The Founder Visa (again) on Monday March 17, 2014 @08:25PM (#7419103)
"Maybe he was too ambitious in asking for 10,000 startup visas per year." hmm, lowering expectations a couple of orders of magnitude for a highly selective group? i'm a fan of YC and all, and agree that it'll probably end up being the cream of the crop thus a great likelihood to succeed, but i really do wish this issue was tackled properly - its so painful. I'd personally love to build something here (happily even with my own capital) but can't. I appreciate the call for action, though, but man - trying to immigrate here is rough.. when the conversation becomes 'let us just prove it with 100', while time keeps ticking on.. i wonder if anything will really happen.

Older »