nikitamalyavin

Idk how could Fable 5.2 win the benchmarks. In my tonight trials it drifted quite a lot. I was analyzing the feature's design with it, and it lied to me several times, ending up with "You're right." Opus 5.5 was better.

Later, I ran a "health check" session—asking "what went wrong". I read the session, and its suggestion turned out to be something that was already part of the design.

It’s like the attention mechanism is too leaky or something.

> AI-generated text is harder to spot, but that hasn’t deterred them

The second sentence on the article is likely AI-generated

Now he's gonna be replaced by AI

What will happen if we'll build a real-life test if the proposed counterexample? The exactly same force, as defined, shape of the vortex, etc?

We should either see the effect or get to understanding of how to correct the model.

Note that the force is finite and doesn't "know" the vortex config. The singularity should be achieved in a finite time.

That also sounds like (populist) politics... And basically any marketing/PR.