nhooey
I'm a full-stack software engineer with 12 years of experience, including Endeca, Vine (Twitter), and as the tech lead for Search at Shutterstock Images. I'm available for full or part-time work. I also have a bachelor of Mathematics and Computer Science from the University of Waterloo.
I can build a web application from front to back, providing guidance to plan a simple, iterative implementation that meets your needs. I can also lead a team of engineers.
I also have DevOps experience at TunnelBear and Vine (Twitter). Most of my experience has been building scalable web applications, making build systems and doing configuration management, and React web apps.
Skills:
* Java, Scala, Python, JavaScript + TypeScript
* React, Redux, Angular, Spring Boot, Django
* Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, Heroku
* ElasticSearch, Solr, Redis, MySQL, PostgreSQL, RabbitMQ, MongoDB
* Docker, Kubernetes, Ansible, Chef, Puppet
* GitLab Continuous Integration
LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/nhooey/Email: nhooey at gmail.com
I'm a full stack software engineer with 9 years professional coding experience.
I specialize in search and DevOps, with experience writing front-end web applications. I can help build your web application's frontend and backend, set up continuous integration and deployment, build search and indexing systems, plan and deploy backend infrastructure with configuration management, and more.
Technologies:
- Backend: Python, Java, C++, Ruby, Flask, Django, MySQL, MongoDB, ElasticSearch, Solr, Redis, RabbitMQ, Docker, AWS EC2
- Frontend: Angular, JavaScript, JQuery, CSS
- DevOps: Ansible, Puppet, Chef, Sensu, Nagios, Icinga, Supervisor
Professional Experience:
- TunnelBear, Vine (Twitter), Shutterstock, Endeca (Oracle)
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nhooey
Stack Overflow: https://stackoverflow.com/users/14193/neil
GitHub: https://github.com/nhooey
Email: [email protected]
Open to hourly or project-based billing.
I have an agreement with many friends to be an operator so they can look something up on the web, or anything else requiring some efficient technical prowess.
We just call up each other and say "operator", and if you're near a computer, you help out with whatever it is.
Figure out what happened to the tops of everyone's heads when they were outside, that is...
Not to mention that the US isn't the only market for smartphones out there, so a large portion of the market certainly don't care if something is manufactured in the US.
Making quality software is probably the biggest opportunity for RIM right now, not the location of manufacture.
I've never donated to anything like this, but Sony's actions are fundamentally corrupt and if unchallenged, will set a terrible precedent for all of us, and severely hurt this individual.
Blackberry Messenger (BBM) also has a typing indicator, delivered and read indicators, and it's faster than anything else out there.
Also, the fact that it's only on mobile devices and not desktop computers means that you know your message will get delivered to someone's pocket instead of the computer they may have left on. An odd side effect of its lack of portability.
RIM does make money on the use of their Business Enterprise Servers (BES), so in corporate installations they're taking in large sums of money on a per-year basis. Given that, and my assumption of Apple's superior profit per-unit, it might be hard to tell who makes more money on their phones overall.
An Open Letter to the USPTO
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Tablet
It should be coming out in a few weeks, so it should be one of the first decent iPad competitors.
It's more like everyone else tried making Blackberry killers, and has yet to succeed.
Most people don't even think about the fact that they're locked into a contract for 2+ years (in the US), they just think about how the other phones are cheaper. But even for the people who consider the costs of being locked in, they can see that not being locked in provides little advantage.
If the entire market wasn't locked in to their contract, and could trivially take their phone number with them, they would have maximum provider mobility and the competition would get steep. If only a few people do this, it won't actually improve service or make the companies willing to adjust prices to keep these specific customers.
I'm not sure how the market came to this in North America and other select places, but I can see how it's going to be very hard for it to change.
Waiting for the bus really sucks in cold places in the winter, way more than when it's too hot in the summer.
Maybe if everyone had personal super-small Popemobiles that went slow enough they were no more a threat to pedestrians than bicycles.
You can only ride your bike to work if you don't care if you're sweaty, or if you have a shower and the time to use it once you get there.
And one major problem I see with not having cars is being able to go somewhere outside of the city on a weekend, when all the ZipCars are taken. If you reduce the amount of cars a city needs on average, everyone is seriously screwed during peak time. Maybe a graduated pricing scheme would fix this: With all of the cars being more expensive on the weekend, you could have a special set of reserve cars which are even more expensive on the weekend so people who really need them and are willing to pay can depend on that reserve.
However the advantages gained from people sharing cars instead of everyone having their own, far outweigh the costs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Burman
That should give you a sense of how legitimate Al Jazeera has become.
Especially when you pay $25 per GB, and it costs an extra $10 per GB. People will probably stop streaming Pandora over the cell network, and heavily watching movies.
Canada has had data limits the entire time, and Blackberry has been constantly cautioning US providers about offering unlimited data plans in the name of providing better service to their customers.
This kind of limitation for regular ISPs is ridiculous, because the cost of bandwidth is actually cheap, but it's different and much more expensive with cell phone networks.
I would guess that most of the confusion around this point is that Apple's rate of adoption was high given that it came so late into the game, satisfying a part of the market that wasn't before. Apple also has the most marketing, and adoption in the consumer market specifically.
There are tons of businesses that deploy blackberries to a substantial portion of their staff, this is not true with iPhone and is unlikely to change.
One can probably find the numbers if they look, I've only got anecdotal experience for now.
I think you're definitely on to something.
I got a job in Boston from Toronto, and then one in New York from Boston. Getting flown out to Silicon Valley or Seattle for the bigger companies is also pretty common. It's even easier when you have a friend working in another city. The best places to work don't care where their candidates come from if they're good and willing to move.
I think the guy who wrote this article meant to say that it's easier to find a local job. But he's seriously out of touch with reality if he believes it's really hard to find a job in another city.