new2yc

> Running Payment infrastructure have a cost for banks. somebody has to pay for it though taxes or fees.

Then don't hail UPI as a universal payments alternate, its just another interface; in long lines of PayPal, Stripe, etc. and still behind.

> RBI is a statutory institution that is answerable to Elected Govt what are you expecting?

It has (in paper) authority, independence, and accountability to 'manage all banks', set policy/interest rates, and maintain financial stability across all nations; practically butchered by the FC. I expect that they don't. Answerable? More like a puppet. Hypocrisy: Miss out a few EMIs on your home/car loan and see what happens. Big names (Modi, Mallya, etc.) have dues of thousands of crores, what's up with that? Just leave India and you are free?

> Supreme court regularly oversteps its limits and plays govt

SC can't (and don't) oversteps its limits -- it does what it has power to do so and it has finite written specifications on what it can and cannot do (the constitution). SC can't play govt. It keeps a check on the govt. Who keeps check on the govt. then? Media? Public? Freedom of speech? Why did the Law da minister (Kiren Rijiju) gets removed by the upper management? The biggest disadvantage of a highly majority won govt. (& weak opposition) made them fascists.

> This wouldn't affect poor at all.

Absolutely, because poor don't use UPI at all. To middle-class, it will. example: street vendor (food/veggies/general store): a monthly customer will always go above 2k (1% of 2k is 20 INR - straight to govt. which was previously zero). How would you track 69 transactions of <2k each bypassing your taxes?

> Cryptocurrencies are a grift and Govt is right to ban it.

Thanks for showing your non-technical background and illiteracy toward cryptocurrencies. And, 'grift' is not the word you are looking for.

> gov has done a good job as far as fiscal health and Currency stability

Good fiscal health? Just look at numbers of fiscal deficits, increasing debts, declining revenue collections, etc. Inflation, taxes, and interest rates on end-users are on all time high. RBI saying good fiscal health, okay. FDI, which current regime opposed back in UPA govt., has become a better source of income for current government. CMs can be seen begging to foreign investors every now and then. Import duty on electronics from China/Taiwan/Korea/Japan is all time high, and so is their usage (costing only public). This 40% import duty backfiring progress at least a decade, Apple just now has one store in entire India. EVs (Tesla) refused to come to India, till now. Don't count progress that could have been years ago. Agriculture sector has reduced to <20% from ~60% in 15 years. Black money? Better luck after reincarnation. Now, its time to sell every fking govt. owned institutions, from Navratna-like companies, to telecom companies. And, so are ports/railways/roads, costing end-user more toll-taxes just for usage (Pvt. companies will get more revenue than they invested in, from public). Ideas of bullet trains? Comes down to a few Vande-Bharats; most of railways crying. Unnecessary expenses, ridiculous taxes, absurd economic policy, etc. The govt. is carried by religious majority and will continue to do so.

Currency stability? Refers to the ability of a currency to maintain its value or exchange rate over time. Compared to US (20 years), its down 49% and currently along sides of all time highs. Don't argue me on whataboutism here. For rapidly developing countries (e.g. India), it should be negative ideally.

You caught me on a good mood this weekend. Constructive criticisms. No violence.

There you go: [livemint](https://www.livemint.com/news/india/upi-payments-to-now-cost...). You can argue that it is for above 2000 INR, or just for merchants (street vendors?). Implemented on all UPI providers. Also, these corps. also put up random charges -- like any big company, e.g., Platform Fees on recharges at [Paytm](https://www.livemint.com/technology/paytm-starts-levying-pla...).

> Indian (or any) government has no reason to track 500 million people

LOL, don't tell me you are from a technical background

Everything of UPI is well and good, until it has a service tax/TDS on it. The Indian Govt. has already shown their intentions in their parliament (new parliament WOW) and RBI has became a puppet of it (shown by their actions time and time). They tried getting judiciary (SC) but couldn't get it this time -- state judiciaries are long gone (e.g., Gujarat) and Law & Order is obtuse (e.g., killing of a criminal in custody on live national media). Democracy is a 'bitch' there, hypocritical ministers and soldout media would never say anything to authority but bite dead to ops. Govt. institutions (CBI, ED, EC, CID, etc.) are full of work -- targeting oppositions all over the country. Govt. clowns will cry over every fking index out there, claiming national conspiracy or religious angle. Anyway... getting back to the point:

The big UPI mandates corps. (PhonePe, Paytm, and GPay), in India, have started to put transxn fees on UPI transactions. Just like cryptocurrencies (no regulations whatsoever but flat 30% on all the profits), the govt. will find a way to get the juice out of UPI sooner or later. All thanks to that dumb finance minister.

I would love to provide examples of all these allegations if you would like, just Google it.

104 comments and I cannot believe no one has politicise it yet, and since it has nothing to do with Nepo losing, anyway, FUCK RUSSIA.

If you don't care about "performance":

```// Uses first 10 terms of Taylor Series double my_cos(double x) { double sum = 0; for (int n = 0; n < 10; n++) { sum += pow(-1, n) * pow(x, 2 * n) / factorial(2 * n); } return sum; }```

After reading first paragraph, I was sure they don't have any specific reason to replace it.

> leaked in public repo

Me: Yeah, that's why they are doing it.

I would like to know the views of the enthusiasts here.

Yeah, tell us something new.

#unpopularOpinion GPT-4 is not as strong as "we" anticipated, it was just the hype

This is way too hilarious

GitHub is just a mirror of linux; it is not the primary VCS for it.

- Giving attribution to the source, e.g., by confuscating a GPL copy into the manual, when you are making the most money in the chess 'product' scene on a ripped Stockfish, is the least they could have done.

- Chessbase's CEO on their official blog (now deleted) stated that they developed the engine from scratch. They also took a newer version for ripoff and compared it to an older version of Stockfish to claim their Fat Fritz 2/Houdini 6 engines are powerful.

- However lousy their terms are, free software licenses are enforceable by law. It will set an example. Since we are on the topic of chess, a threat is always more assertive than execution. Big tech joined FOSS forces for one simple reason - they could lose more than they could win.

- Stockfish did not suffer significant monetary damage since they don't have a commercial product people already insinuated that there would be no extraordinary financial settlement.

> need to settle than argue the legality It is a vague and circumstantial argument. In practical terms, since it's already been ~1.5 years, a settlement (1-year leverage + entire credit + foss.chessbase.com + GPL enforcement) is enough for the plaintiff. Also, the only time the defendant in a lawsuit agrees to settle out of court is when they expect the trial to be more expensive than the settlement. Generally, this happens when the plaintiff's case is so strong that the defendant is confident the plaintiff will win in court. I agree with the no-one-sided landslide victory; that's what settlement means. Would you not say, given the settlement terms, Stockfish (GPL enforcement) won? The entire open-source community base those enforcements.

I see this as an absolute win.

Plus, some money would be even better. Agreed.

Someone please post this as a win for open source, nsidb. I don't know how

https://lichess.org/blog/Y3u1mRAAACIApBVn/settlement-reached...

There were rumours surrounding react going to a foundation, just like PyTorch went.

Another one in the books. It reminds me of the quote stating whether the research is flawed or otherwise, only time will tell.