natvert
The thing we want to measure is if we can (as a country) live our lives in peace. Better measures of this might be all crime, violent crime, life-span related measures, or even mental health and drug abuse.
Banning one specific thing does not change human nature. We need to take a holistic view to address many issues underlying violent crime, firearm related or not.
I once sold a nice (and expensive) smartphone on ebay. The buyer complained that it did not arrive as described. The phone was fine, but whatever, I thought ebay would just refund the payment and have the buyer return the phone, right? Nope, ebay refunded the buyer and let them keep my phone! No recourse... nothing. Ebay let the buyer steal my phone!
The solution to this (and other problems of social engineering) is to educate the general (democratic) population, so they are aware of and resilient against such attacks. I don't think it's possible to stop everyone from using a given service, but if every user understands the real tradeoffs, then we have a chance. If individuals (and more importantly voters) cannot think and reason for themself, given the facts of a given subject, democracy has no future.
In general though, I think people are smart. They make decisions and tradeoffs with the information they have. The problem here is that they don't understand the real risks. More than the loss of privacy and security, the real problem here is that a hostile nation state seeks to influence the thoughts of free citizens of other (democratic) countries. This is how wars are won and lost -- in the hearts and minds of the people. If everyone who used TikTok saw the situation in a similar light, I doubt it would have the adoption it currently has.
There needs to be a public response by scientists decrying the bad behavior here. It's the least we can do to try to slow the general public's loss of faith in experts.
Even if the rates were very different, the any difference claimed to be caused by specific measures would not necessarily be causal as implied by brimnes. For example, what are risk factors for COVID? Here are some data on obesity: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db56.htm#:~:tex.... What about weather differences? The list goes on.
Lex is a great interviewer, always focused on the other human being he is talking to and assuming the best in them. Lex's humility and unselfish love of others shines though.
Jay is a fantastic resource on COVID. He is a pragmatists who believes and communicates the truth as he understands it. An example from the episode is when Jay reflects on his family helping him run the Santa Clara seroprevalence study. He is in real fear for his family members, because he doesn't understand how dangerous the virus is and for which demographics. Once he better understands the virus, he proposes a very reasonable approach to living with this endemic disease.
On a serious note though, the 2nd amendment protects the American right to own and carry a gun. We should be teaching gun safety like drivers ed, not blaming violence on the tool. Just like an OS, this tool can be used for nefarious purposes or the protection of basic human rights.
Looks like _all_ community hospitals in the US have about 100,000 beds (including all types of ICU beds, even pediatric for example) https://www.aha.org/statistics/fast-facts-us-hospitals
Spread this out to cover the entire number of community hospitals ~5000, and that means if 5 families of 4 people get sick in any community, the hospital will be "overrun"
Stats like this should be presented in absolute numbers and given in context with comparable historical norms, e.g. deaths by other or all causes.
What I really want to know is how the likelihood of death by covid is related to likelihood of death by say, for example, car.
Requirements such as the vaccine mandate will not have the intended effect, but perhaps even the opposite. Want more people to quit their jobs? Requiring everyone to put something in their bodies they don't want there is a great way to do it!
Tesla’s vision/ml systems are amazing. I would love to learn more about how unit testing for this type of error is done. Without some intermediate semantic representation, I don't see how these large, multi-head, end-to-end systems can isolate and regression? System tests are maybe possible, but it's unclear how well a system test would generalize to related, but unseen cases.
To your point though, what if a few or even all Fortune n companies formed countries (or one country together). Who would the sanctions really hurt/benefit? I doubt it would hurt the corporate nation states as much as the others.
Instead of fixing smart TVs, this "repairman" would go around with a hot air rework station and unsolder wifi chips from working smart TVs.
If I had a TV I would unsolder the wifi chip. Maybe even easier -- just cut the antenna traces on the PCB.