mycpuorg

@danielhanchen, can we use these steps to fine tune other qwen3 models too? like 480B coder or embeddings model?

I remember being ridiculed on reddit back when I posted this.

"Turns out, we think you are all dumb."

Hi Mom!

Shameless Plug:

I was very fortunate to have a conversation with him a few years ago. We talked a bit about his journey and a bit about his hacks, his setup, and of course a lot about Linux:

http://www.mycpu.org/interview-with-GKH/

"... Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos or Elizabeth Holmes..." LOL wut?

Go home professor, you are drunk :D

<3

Seriously, what is wrong with this? It's a for-profit private org. Does this really deserve the top spot on HN? What's next? "Toyota showroom wants you buy a Corolla instead of a used VW"?

Granted. I am not equipped to answer the question, assumption about js could be wrong too. Perhaps, I should replace javascript with HTML. The argument still holds about distractions and phishing risks etc.

True. I think the workflow will continue to be fragmented even with richer email content.

Wow! Source?

Not sure I understand your question, but in general rich web experience is close to 0. I use html2text which is good for the most part but if you receive emails with embedded javascript and you want to avoid them (a lot of phishing traps goes out of the equation with plaintext). It's a matter of your personal preference and priority. If you like the sort of things mentioned in the article you should give it a shot, at least, try taking a 2-week sabbatical from web email.

Sounds like you will :)

Hi, author of the blog here. It is not everything, but if you were optimizing for certain things like less distraction, fewer "fire fighting threads", detailed thoughts shared via email then Emacs is great. I have learnt to live in plain text for a while now and it is great because a lot the cases don't really require you to respond in html. If you are doing it often, it's probably worth attaching a 2-pager.

But if you are in a, say consultant role, where quicker email responses to clients, html support, MS Word like highlighting, then this is not it.

Trying to understand how is any this is new or different from AWS SageMaker or even Azure ML? IIUC AWS has way better tools/services to integrate with.

Most Google's Cloud Services have been very flaky and inconsistent.