mumumu
A small speedup on the longest (by time) part of the program is usually better than infinite speedup on a short part of the program.
Data from sensor and to display are usually (but not always) raw and uncompressed.
To go beyond 8k 120fps we will need fiber, or better compression.
We have good codecs to move data online. And specialized ASIC to do live encoding with good quality.
The current compression defined by HDMI is very rudimentary.
Any progress on the control of chaotic flow is great news. Even at subsonic speed.
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/why-shooting-down-chin...
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/why-shooting-down-chin...
Not exactly comparable.
But I agree. High end commercial solid storage, such Optane, would likely exceeds the requirements needed by the aviation industry.
The blog post I mentioned:
Paper: Parsing Gigabytes of JSON per Second https://branchfree.org/2019/02/25/paper-parsing-gigabytes-of...
Another related post from Lemire:
Ridiculously fast unicode (UTF-8) validation https://lemire.me/blog/2020/10/20/ridiculously-fast-unicode-...
Those algorithms are fast. But to put them in perspective. A single x86 CPU can write 64B per cycle. At 5GHz, the theorical maximum bandwidth is 320 GBps. IIRC, the read bandwidth is twice that.
There are others botlenecks, and is very hard to write code that writes at every cycle.
A interesting consequence, is that the theorical maximum bandwidth is logarithmical to the number of cycles. Again, talking about branchless streaming application.
And most of the speedup is because of tricks to avoid doing beaches. There is a great blog post from one of the authors of JSON SIMD discussing this.
I'm on mobile, there is a link for the blog post on the simd JSON github repository.
But those i9 ks sku can achieve a couple hundred extra MHz. But have a much higher base clock speed.
A lot of sbc boards support MIPI CSI (iirc even RPI). Nvidia robotic modules has IO for Sony's LVDS (driver not provided though).
Friends that drink it ask for people traveling to SA to bring them some. They are also very particular about how to choose it.
Brazilian websites uses patterns that aren't that common on American sites. All news organizations and all large e-commerce uses the browser's notification and localization API (some ask before trying).
To view the content on those sites, I need to deal with about 5 interruptions. The previously two, plus newsletter, "accept cookies" modal, "special offer" pop-up, "free shipping" sticky window.
And those are >1 bi usd companies.
I looked into that a year or two ago and there were papers on the this.
Anyone who is familiar with Euler Video Magnification and with neural network likely though of that.
Does this work in encoded videos? I doubt. Intel probably can add a a feature the video encoder and sell it as an authentication service for webcam communication on Intel Plataform.
Others languages such Chapel, Halide probably will do fine
The downside of cherry picking features is that your browser fingerprint becames pretty much unique.
Recently they added ":modal" that will make paywalls harder to bypass. Most sites haven't implement yet, but I've already disabled this "feature" on config.
See csswg
Also, check "massonary".
There are so many cool features in css being released today that soon that banner "Best viewed on Netscape 3 on 800*600 resolution" may be common in some niche design sites.
But more likely as "Best viewed on Google Canary xxx, on flip screen devices with 10 bit depth colorspace".
By the way, did you know there is a css spec for rounded screen devices?