mtschopp
Re:Tell HN: AWS appears to be down again
on Wednesday December 15, 2021 @10:52AM (#29567663)
Could it be related to a Log4j issue?
Re:NPM Is Down
on Wednesday December 15, 2021 @10:45AM (#29567538)
CircleCI has problems downloading npm packages either
Leveling Up Your JavaScript
Switzerland: Poised for a revolution?
The Hardest, Shortest, Lesson Becoming a Manager
React Native might become the first multi-platform framework that actually works
Software versions are broken
Node.js and ES6 Instead of Java – Part II: Test-Driven Development
Reflections on being a new developer
Containers Are Dead. Long Live Observable Combinators
Exploring the Future of Driving
Superintelligence Now
Learn Golang and GraphQL and Relay #2
An interactive introduction to neural networks
Is Weak Typing Strong Enough? (2005)
Atomo – Clojure's Atom Implementation in JavaScript
Re:Responsive CSS grid, reordered with native HTML5 drag and drop
on Friday September 04, 2015 @12:47PM (#10171533)
It's because jQuery is a library on top of JavaScript. That makes it slower than native JavaScript.
If you don't need to support very old browsers you can easy go without jQuery.
Have a look at http://youmightnotneedjquery.com
Re:ReactJS for Stupid People (2014)
on Sunday August 16, 2015 @02:59PM (#10069868)
A bit of both. With React we now have a much nicer code structure, because it forces us to think in components. We have a JS file and an SCSS file for each component. Before we rendered the view on the server side with Python/Jinja2.
I think there are many reasons for the productivity boost. Thinking in components, more readable code, great debugging possibilities, understandable data flow, to name a few.
And, last but not least, it is lots of fun :-).
Re:ReactJS for Stupid People (2014)
on Sunday August 16, 2015 @01:36PM (#10069588)
You cannot really compare a React project with a non-React project if it is done by different people.
We use React since four months, and we develop faster compared to before, when we used only jQuery.
Re:ReactJS for Stupid People (2014)
on Sunday August 16, 2015 @10:49AM (#10069021)
That's right, Flux is not that easy to understand. We use Reflux for the sake of it's simplicity. Here is a good comparison of Flux and Reflux:
https://www.amberbit.com/blog/2015/7/14/flux_vs_reflux/
Re:ReactJS for Stupid People (2014)
on Sunday August 16, 2015 @08:55AM (#10068776)
Why is React only for the enthusiasts? Big corps like Netflix and Atlassian use it in production.
Best practices for building large React applications
Re:Show HN: React Resolver – Async Rendering and Data-Fetching for React
on Monday August 10, 2015 @04:26AM (#10033337)
Nice to see some effort in this area. How is it compatible with the flux architecure?
A form input builder and validator for React JS
Re:Chrome React extension that highlights components on the page
on Thursday July 23, 2015 @05:34AM (#9934751)
Nice idea. Would be cool if an element's background-color changes for a second whenever it has been rerendered.