mtharrison
So “purely stochastic” overstates it a bit: the distribution is computed deterministically, and you choose whether to sample from it or not.
Claude Opus 4.6 visible on list models endpoint
[ { "data": [ { "type": "model", "id": "claude-opus-4-6", "display_name": "Claude Opus 4.6", "created_at": "2026-02-04T00:00:00Z" }, { "type": "model", "id": "claude-opus-4-5-20251101", "display_name": "Claude Opus 4.5", "created_at": "2025-11-24T00:00:00Z" }, { "type": "model", ...
These sort of projects always look cool but I think the real "wow factor" would be a file upload where you can see the result on your image. I assume there are reasons why this isn't done.
USDA website blames "Radical Left Democrats" for shutdown
Show HN: PromptScaper – Prototype AI agents with no code
Show HN: PromptScape – prototyping AI agents without writing code
Show HN: Thoughtcoach Open-Sourced. AI Therapist
But I fully understand and appreciate the comments made by other posters.
I have put it back online with a disclaimer that must be acknowledged, and pointed out this is a research app not a substitute for therapy.
I hope that does enough to mitigate some of the risks, whilst allowing me to continue to work at making this a safer and more valuable resource. Whenever that may be, or not :)
So to be successful with such a tool, a good level of self-awareness is required.
Yes a tool as an adjunct to regular therapy is a good opportunity. I discussed this actually with my own therapist and he thought it was a good idea, with the NHS being so overwhelmed here in the UK to be able to have a first-line resource-cheap option is appealing.
I suppose the thing to figure out is how this is best done in a safe and useful manner.
Robert Burns (of CBT fame) is currently involved in an app which incorporates AI so I'm interested to see how they've dealt with the sensitive issues.
From your comment however, you don't rule out applying AI in this field entirely?