mswift42

I'd like to point out that amazon is making ginormous profits, meaning increasing wages and ensuring safe working conditions would hardly make a dent in amazons revenue.

> It seems like most of the times, the result is a higher price for the customer, at least when things go well.

Can you substantiate this claim?

With the vast majority of goods the price is set by the market, i.e. higher wages would indeed result in a smaller profit margin and not in a higher price.

The contributor list is expanding :)

Youtube

No, I'm using gnome-shell which uses mutter as wm.

But using gnome tweaks you can enable Emacs Input, which if you are used to emacs key bindings, is really handy navigating in gnome-terminal or, as mentioned web browser address bars.

There are two things keeping me using Chrome.

1) Videostreams are way smoother using Chrome, at least on Linux.

2) I've enabled Emacs Input in Gnome. When I enter something in the address bar, both Firefox and Chrome show suggestions for websites below. In Chrome I can type Ctrl+n / Ctrl+p to navigate between the suggestions, because it respects my keyboard schema.

In Firefox this opens new browser windows :( and I've found absolutely no way to change this behaviour.

I don't think there are any.

However, you easily can install alternative readers on Kobo ereaders, see here for a list of some hacks:

https://www.mobileread.com/forums/showthread.php?t=295612

> Users banding together to send crypto anonymously toward their favorite sites and creators is not "parasitic"

True, but replacing ads you don't get compensated for with ads you do, is.

Brave's business model is to replace a web site's ads for which the web site gets compensated for, with ads brave gets compensated for.

What happens to the small sites that don't track users, but display some ads to keep the servers running? Hope that they get "rewarded with BAT's accordingly to the users attention" ?

Btw, I'm guessing you are a Brave employee, that many Buzzwords in one comment would otherwise be quite astonishing, how does Brave guarantee a users privacy? I assume brave "phones home" in order to replace ads with ads Brave gets compensated for.

Also, I read a lot about a transparent way funds are distributed among publishers, where is the code?

The first time I heard of Brave, I thought Oh cool, a privacy focused, chromium based browser. But I must say I'm honestly appalled by its parasitic business model.

Content creators are strong armed into becoming verified publishers, while users have to trust Brave that their data is handled properly and carefully.