mon_insider
Re:Does not GPU compute
on Friday June 03, 2016 @01:39AM (#11828557)
I don't remember there ever was a time were FP64 was considered a big deal for mobIle GPUs.
The article is trying to debunk a claim that was never popular to begin with.
Re:The Nvidia DGX-1 Deep Learning Supercomputer in a Box
on Tuesday April 05, 2016 @08:39PM (#11435770)
A 980 Ti doesn't have FP16 hardware. The only Maxwell based component with such support is their Tegra part.
Re:The Nvidia DGX-1 Deep Learning Supercomputer in a Box
on Tuesday April 05, 2016 @08:36PM (#11435759)
I don't think CUDA vs OpenCL is the real issue. It's the libraries that come with them. It matters little in which language they were written, since they are closed source for the most part.
AMD's Boltzmann initiative won't solve the lack of libraries.
Re:Graphics Double Data Rate (GDDR5X) SGRAM Deep Dive
on Friday January 22, 2016 @02:03PM (#10954830)
The article isn't complete, but I added a new paragraph this morning that completes the sentence you mention.
Re:Graphics Double Data Rate (GDDR5X) SGRAM Deep Dive
on Friday January 22, 2016 @02:01PM (#10954808)
The rising edge is 0->1. You say that's the falling edge. Typo?
Re:Graphics Double Data Rate (GDDR5X) SGRAM Deep Dive
on Friday January 22, 2016 @01:59PM (#10954796)
I'm the author of this article.
I put it on the website two weeks ago to kick off Google indexing my site, but most articles are incomplete, including this one.
Still, I think there's a bit more detailed information that why you can find on commercials websites who don't bother to read the JEDEC specs.