molmalo
This is crazy.
And when he was immersed into the money-making game, he was all in, willing to do anything to win.
But when you eventually beat the game, you don't get that thrilled anymore, there's no big challenge ahead. You can play for a while to see how far can you go, but it ends up being boring after a while.
So, I think he moved on to basically a real life version of reversal Plague Inc (instead of trying to infect everyone, he tries to beat a disease). This is a harder challenge in many ways, because he needs to deal with tons of geopolitics, international affairs, research and development, human behavior, etc.
If you see it from that perspective, you can still see that he is still a hard player, but this time, he is playing a game that can be beneficial for everybody, not just himself.
I had to stop looking, and look back several times before my mind could actually see some of those pictures correctly.
And I say this, living in a country that has had something similar to a basic income for years, although not fully universal (universal for kids, and people below certain income line), the vast majority of people get it and ended up resulting in that around half the public budget goes to social expenses. Every year that bag gets bigger, deficit gets bigger and having more currency flowing, inflation gets bigger and bigger.
So, this income is increased and salaries get adjusted, and it ends up in a never-ending cycle of income trying to catch up with inflation.
It's very hard to get out of that situation once you are in it, because now people depend on this money, and the political cost to cut it is so enormous that nobody dares trying to do it. It would mean the end of their political careers.
Maybe Germany can show us that it can be done, it will be very interesting to see the results. But from what I've experienced, this is not as simple as many people think it is.
It's like saying: how is it better to have multiple supermarkets to buy the stuff i want, if they offer the same product at different prices? Well... it's an option, nobody forces you to do it. You can always go to the same place, and know that there's going to be times when you pay more, and times when you pay less.
But you also have the chance to check on other store's offers and buy there if you want.
> How is having to navigate N stores
You don't "have to". In the end, more offer = better for consumers. It's up to each individual person to decide if they want to find better prices or just go to their default place.
You know what would be a better solution for that? The same one that happens with some applications now on Android: publishing an app in multiple stores. Many apps are simultaneously published in Play Store and other stores.
For example, you could have a game published on the publisher's store. If you buy it there, the price is X. Simultaneously, you could have the same app published on Apple store for $X + 30%.
Then, you let the market decide. Increasing competition is better for consumers.
If you prefer the convenience of buying from just one store, it's OK, you can buy everything from the Apple store, and pay the premium for that. But that would also let the door open for people who want to choose where else to buy their stuff.
It's easy to talk about how other people's work should be given for free when you have a source of income every month, and your basic needs are covered.
But if the author is trying to live of his work, as it's the case here, it's a decision that should be respected.
And Yes, you can disagree with him, and in that case, you can vote with your wallet by not buying it and using any other app.
Take this picture before after of Cristiano Ronaldo, for example:
https://elbocon.pe/resizer/0hZVESd2S5BEAOwYYdT6_FUcIEE=/980x...
Where I live, we banned plastic bags in 2017. Every store at first sold cloth bags, for buyers who didn't bring their own. Some weeks later, everyone had several reusable bags, that they would bring when buying stuff, not a hard thing to do.
Those bags last even years, so I don't understand why you think people wouldn't reuse them. They actually are quite better (they don't make my fingers hurt, won't break so easily, etc).
To enter the buildings in the campus, you need to get a "passport", after completing antibody test and lots of questions... Some preconditions, like being asthmatic disqualifies you (so you need to follow classes online). Also, they have several new rules, like using only stairs to move across floors, minimum distance, thermal cameras, etc.
It's a new world in many aspects.
You need to have a permit to use your car or walk more than a few blocks from home (for essential workers, like security, health workers, grocery store workers, transportation, etc). If you are stopped driving without a permit, the car is seized, and you lose it forever. You also end up with a criminal record.
This severity has kept the numbers much lower than originally predicted, flattening the curve, but at the same time, it's draining the economy.
So, as you can see, different countries have different strategies. In some places the lockdown is severe, in others, not so much.
But in some poor areas, some people are refusing to comply with the quarantine, even attacking police cars [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KO4YI8L8l30]. So, the gov is trying harder to communicate the need for isolation, but if people keep disobeying, they said they have Martial Law on the table, they just don't want to get to that point...
It could be related to the fact that Spring is starting in the Northern Hemisphere, and thus, the body reacts to the increased amount of polen in the air.
I'm allergic, so it's normal for me to suffer those symptoms every Spring.
Also, there's reported cases of people relapsing after being "recovered". Some of them even died, increasing suspicion that this virus might be biphasic:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-health-reinfection-...
We simply don't know a lot about this virus yet.
https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-recovery-damage-...