molasses
https://www.inference.org.uk/dasher/
I've been thinking about it some more recently, as AI could assist with word completion, and augmenting it with some AI helpers could really improve things. And if the idea was extended.
Not wanting to sound like an able-ist snob, but interfacing with traditional computers with a keyboard is hard. And the interface is clumsy. Even touch devices and keyboards. My Mum could never use a computer, but she has worked out how to use a tablet and find videos on Youtube. I keep meaning to introduce her to voice input. As this would really benefit her.
Despite the huge tech leaps with smartphones and tablets and what not, I do feel there has been a huge regression in basic communication between people only exacerbated by the pandemic. There's knowledge available easily at people's fingertips and that's great, along with new channels of communication. But text based comms have retarded many people.
At the same time, I've containered much of my interaction with Google so it can't draw on my past history. So I have no idea what I'm missing. It did have a tendency to feedback loop a bit too much for me in the past, pigeon holing me to specific websites. There's a huge trust issue, you leak your ID in about four common regular queries so I'm not so sure I can even beat it.
I think there are still lots of people that are on-boarding. And over time they simmer down. Much is poor etiquette unwittingly forced, as we have finger fumbling interfaces.
HN is far more simple in approach, but you only really stand a chance if you monitor your own thread. Kind of. So you just end up glancing this and that. Or trying to read something and then give up. Threads only get traction for about a day and people fall off reading them precisely because engagement requires a silly cognitive leap.
Natural conversations are a bit all over the place, but the brain is quite good at forming some kind of narrative. Despite participants sometimes have wildly differing interpretations. These aren't even apparent in the moment. Ruminating delays, and going back to conversations from yesterday doesn't much happen, unless you have quite an intimate relationship with someone, or you are very topic focused.
Throw many disjointed feeds into the mix, and how on earth do you navigate them, let alone participate in them.
About the only thing that kind of works for me when thinking back is something like newsnet, with basic topic threading. With well considered posts.
Apologies for adding to the noise.
I've had to resort in the past of putting a small web server on the phone, just to get files off it via WIFI. But of course that's clunky.
If peer to peer networking were easier, trustable etc, it could be a real life saver. There's some feature in Google Files that's WIFI sharing, but I haven't tried it.
For music, I bought a DLNA renderer (more like a Chromecast), and just assumed that lots of software could remotely talk to it. But about the only software that almost works with it is something with a poor UI from yesteryear on Android. And music service support is hit and miss. So I'm edging towards Bluetooth now.
That said, yesterday I resorted to CDs. And today, I've jacked a spare phone into an auxiliary port. And I won't use my phone for Bluetooth music mainly because if I walk out the room or want to take a call it all goes tits up.
I've had Bluetooth on Debian Linux on my Thinkpad for years, and different releases have been hit and miss for things like file transfer. And address book syncing. And that's not confined to Linux either.
When it works... It does feel like magic.
Really I want to easily route sound from one app to a particular device or devices with easy remote management. Voice control is a bit hit and miss. But hands free remote is a good idea.
UI is very esoteric, like when you are offered a list of Bluetooth services. A phone I had would offer itself as a remote device or something, but I never figured out how and what it did. Or the worry that your phone might turn into a data access point accidentally.
Otter 1.0.02 on Manjaro.
qt.qpa.xcb: QXcbConnection: XCB error: 3 (BadWindow), sequence: 580, resource id: 8418551, major code: 40 (TranslateCoords), minor code: 0 Segmentation fault (core dumped)
And the O is a bit reminiscent of Opera. ( I read it hopes to ape some of the better bits of Opera's past.)
Certainly space for an innovative - I'm in the driving seat type browser. The space is really lack-lustre, and not in a good way.
File explorer multi pick is the thing I desperately claw for for a pointer.
Someone donated an old pc. We turned it on and it had win 3.1 on and it booted in a blip. We looked at each other in amazement. It's odd what you forget. And at the time I preferred the 3.1 style to 95, though tooling was pretty horrible. Changing video modes for example.
Win 95 also didn't originally come with TCP/IP from what I remember. Pre internet os, that you wrestled with to get internet support on.
Later service pack version came bundled with the web client stuff.
Networking was very hit and miss back then.
I was stuck on a 1.3mbits/s link and waited a day for a dist update that never happened.
I walked away from Windows then, and came back 6 years later. Win 10 on spinner and older hardware with 2gb ram. This originally was touted as a frugal os.
Took a day and a half of updates on a faster connection.
The machine then was so slow and CPU sucking when idle, I couldn't do anything with it. A browser would down it. Totally unusable.
Gave in, had Debian on it within an hour and it is okay with chromium, but still 2gb limits it heavily. But at least it works.
Casts mind back to win98 era, and same hardware would fly.
So if stable, and no reboots don't care so much.
They killed hibernate in Windows for a faster boot didn't they?
I have vista on a ten year laptop, and that is quite fast to boot, but now unsupported and breaks.