modernmicro
https://www.zidisha.org/index.php?p=43
The statistics page was also changed to only show lending statistics for loans disbursed in the last three months. As a result, new visitors will see the write off rate stated as 0%. These loans haven't had time to be written off, so that write off rate is always going to be 0%.
Meanwhile your all time write off rate is still 18.66%. That should be the statistic displayed to new visitors, not 0%.
The thing is, you have a lot of angry lenders who feel misled by your marketing. After using your site and reviewing your marketing, I think they have good reason to be upset. Zidisha has a track record of downplaying its loan loss rates. I'm not the only who feels this way: your lenders are very upset about it.
You mentioned you had a long response explaining why my article was inaccurate. But your response mostly just said that you say Zidisha is risky in your FAQ, terms of use and other internal pages.
Why not put your repayment/loan loss rates and mission statement on your frontpage?
To achieve that at the max interest rate you allow (~10% APR), you would need a 2.4% loan loss rate. That's an order of magnitude below where Zidisha is now. That would be an incredible achievement and I would gladly cover it as a huge story!
Is Zidisha on track to deliver a 2.4% loan loss rate?
* Kiva: 98.95% repayment [1]
* United Prosperity: 97.8% repayment [2]
* Vittana: 95%+ [3]
* Kiva Zip: 88.8% [4]
* Zidisha: 74.19% [5]
I noticed that Zidisha doesn't publicize its low repayment rate (and the correspondingly high loss rate) very broadly - for example, on your frontpage. If you did, your forums probably wouldn't be filled with comments like these:
"The long-posted 98% repayment rate left me with a bitter taste. I feel both deceived and stupid." - mewesten
"I think you will not care at all when zidisha folds and you will not care at all at all the lenders loosing all their money. You will pat yourself on the back at all the money given to borrowers and what good work you did giving away other peoples money. Is it legal what you are doing? These are funds provided by members of the public it is not your money." - Russell
"If the model is to be sustainable, lenders must surely be made to feel that their interests are taken into account. They may choose to act as if they are in fact not lenders at all but givers - but that is not your advertised model, and would soon run into the sand in any case." - Wiredfox
"Your vision for Zidisha as a marketplace like ebay was a surprise for me to read in the forum. There is no clear explanation of this on Zidisha’s website. The impression I have had from the website is that Zidisha is just like Kiva and the others, except for the comments and low interest. It never occurred to me that no one was reviewing the business loan applications. I assumed Zidisha was somehow doing this." - Evelyn
These are your own lenders talking.
I think that if you explored some of the ideas I mentioned (e.g. featuring the repayment rate and loan loss rate on the frontpage, and adding a mission statement to the frontpage as well), you would see less angry lenders like the above.
[1] http://www.kiva.org/about/stats
[2] http://www.unitedprosperity.org/us/risk_factors
http://modernmicrocredit.blogspot.com/2014/03/modern-microcr...
Zidisha just happened to be the first topic I started with. My next article is going to be about revenue models in crowdfunding. Some companies are using some dark design patterns in their revenue models, and I plan to cover that as well:
http://modernmicrocredit.blogspot.com/2014/04/revenue-models...
As I mention in the introduction to my article, I wasn't planning on writing a followup on Zidisha. But then you responded to my last article by dramatically lowering your interest rates. So I wrote a followup covering what that meant for lenders.
Like I said in the article, Zidisha shows a lot of promise, and I very much want the concept to succeed. But to do that, I think you need to start being more transparent about the problem you have with high loan loss rates. I would love to see a long response from you regarding the article. I'd be happy to publish your response in the comments of my article, or even in the article itself. If you have any corrections, I'd be glad to publish those as well.