mlN90
Nothing in that blogpost seems credible. "Dude trust me" is a shitty source.
Yes, because whether he is a racist or not is not relevant to the point i was making.
> We [...]
We, do not need to do anything. But go ahead, engage him, feed him with the social interaction the rest of us deprive him of - because he is a shitty person.
Waste your time all you want.
> Coming to your comments; "positive stereotypes" just earn a gentle laugh while "negative stereotypes" lead to racist behaviour with a disproportionate impact on the real world. They are not the same.
Predictable that you are missing the point entirely. Please reread the exchange, one line at a time. Else you might think and label me as a racist because you have put up a communication barrier and absolutely refuse to understand my original point.
I'm making extreme examples out of the sentence, but putting something 'awesome' with it. Being good at math / Fast runners etc - to make the point very concise and on point.
Had i run with the theme and went "White people who shoots up schools [...]" or "Black people who sell crack cocaine" you would have likely missed the point entirely because I'm using negative-stereotypes.
That the child-comment elaborates his thoughts into racist ramblings is frankly irrelevant to me. The guy is clearly both illiterate, insensitive and likely in the silly end of the bell curve.
Honest question, when you read the line "[...]Chinese that are good at math [...]" do you read that all Chinese people are math-wizards? Because that is not what it says.
What about "[...] black people that are fast runners [...]"?
all 3 examples, including the one that turned on your torch of virtue, describes a sub-set of a group, the primary attribute of said group and nothing more.
If anything the implication that the guy you were replied to is somehow biased and "racist" against the absolute-plague-tier of disproportional scammers coming out of India is based on nothing but your inability to differentiate between "broadspectrum-racism" and "critism of a subset of a group"
MIT repurposed a router to look through walls for people. Does that mean that 2.4 GHz routers are spycraft tools?
How the trick works is all about exploiting what people affiliate with something. So the picture is an elephant? Remind people that mice exists ("oh im a little late, we had an exterminator get rid of a bunch of mice today") Feed the occupants peanuts and have big fucking ears yourself. At some point people are gonna think elephant, a percentage of those people will draw an elephant.
You get the point.
Jokes aside, I would be interested to see if there is any "sources" to his claim, but in all likelihood there isn't and there never will be.
there is no evidence that the alphabet-boys hijacked the term "Conspiracy theorist" and used the media to change people's perception that conspiracy theorists is batshit crazy people with tinfoil hats.
How many years were you not labelled a tinfoil-hatter if you tried to describe the echelon program pre-snowden, even though he wasn't the first to leak about FIVE EYES, especially the part how the western SIGINT community circumvented the laws prohibiting domestic dragnet spying in their own respective countries?
Find something elevated to stand on. Like a box or a street curb. Stand on the "front palms" of your foot and lower/raise yourself so your heels go as far down they can, and up! Im not sure what they are called, but i will refer to them as chris adler squats.
The only tools i see there is Calorie / Macro / One Rep Max calculators along with exercise guides. Did you click on an ad?
Also here is a quick fasting guide: "Eat less." You can word it however you want, you can spread those two words out on a 6 months program and fill-in with a bunch of newage-bullshit but it IS that simple.
And to your real question: its nothing different than saying movies and video games inspires a CRAZY PERSON to do harm. I can read 'Mein Kampf' without building gas chambers, and I'm sure you can too.