mjwhansen

As the CEO, I mean, yeah, please do check out our plans and pricing!

We’re not selling anything about AI and have no association with Claude Code, though

Nothing but love to Adam and the Tailwind team (including now-former team members) today. They’ve made huge contributions to web development and it just sucks, sucks, sucks that things have turned out this way. I know he’ll find a way forward, though.

That's wild! Hopefully someone at Cloudflare sees this and can help you out

For people outside DC:

18F [1] was the government’s design group, and did incredible work to improve the level of visual, UX, and UI design as well as usability across federal government websites. They created standards, led trainings and workshops, and were a go-to resource for people in and outside of the government.

You may have heard about the US Digital Service, but 18F were equally rockstar-level in the local community. Highly dedicated civil servants who were very good at what they did and very good at communicating it to others.

In May, DOGE unceremoniously gutted the department and shut it down.

Thankfully, they’ve archived their guides on an external site [2]. I didn’t even work for the federal government but I used to use these all the time when I was a product manager.

If you happen to see a resume come across your desk from someone who worked at 18F, jump on that. You’re lucky.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/18F

[2] https://guides.18f.org/

Ben, can I get a vowel, please?

Such a cool project, Ben!

That's really good to hear, thanks!

The organizer of Longhorn PHP is a friend of ours (Daniel Abernathy), and we have a somewhat official-unofficial rule that we always sponsor our friends' conferences :)

Thanks for being part of SSBA and continuing to raise awareness!

Thanks for spreading the word about SSBA!

Co-Founder of Geocodio here — glad we were able to help with your geocoding+timezone needs!

(And glad to hear that conference sponsorships work. A lot of smaller conferences are struggling to find sponsors these days, so if anyone reading is in a position to sponsor, the organizer of your favorite conference would probably appreciate it!)

Congrats on four years, Max! Thanks for mentioning my book, glad to hear it has been helpful!

yep! Local governments create some of the source data we use for tax purposes.

We have more about our data sources here: https://www.geocod.io/data-sources/

Co-Founder of Geocodio here who designed the scoring system :)

I suppose you could call it inspired by Bayesian inference since we're using multiple pieces of independent evidence to calculate a score, though that makes it sound a bit fancier than it is and we aren't using the Bayes' theorem. But it's possible I had that in the back of my head from a game theory class I took long ago.

But for the fun of it, let's model it that way:

Probability (Spam | disposable email domain, IP address, etc... ) = [probability(disposable email domain, IP address, etc... | spam) x prior probability(spam rate)] / probability(disposable email domain, IP address, etc...)

Or something like that.

Also — it's a delight to have one of Patrick's articles mentioned in connection with this!

This is awesome!

Totally agree, Justin!

Interesting…

There's a bit more to it than that.

As a way to make those tax cuts appear paid for, they changed how R&D expenditures -- which includes software development on software that has ALREADY been commercialized -- has to be amortized.

This was a budgetary sleight-of-hand that made the tax cuts appear paid for.

Most small companies are LLCs, not Corporations, and therefore pay personal tax rates.

As a result, software and other tech companies now have phantom profits because their engineer salaries and other expenses are no longer deductions.

IRS guidance: https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-23-63.pdf

It changes it so that it takes effect after 2025. (It is expected to be automatically renewed at that point)

This bill retroactively fixes it for 2022-2023 as well as 2024-2025. A permanent one-time fix is too expensive from a Congressional Budget Office scoring perspective, but lots of initiatives are renewed every few years. It's just how Congress works

A more precise term might be "computer vision," which is indeed a field of AI, but it is a less-known term even among a reasonably technical laypeople (such as might be reading a business publication like the MIT Tech Review).

There's a 200+ page Code of Points[1] that determines how much each skill is worth as well as each error. At the elite level, there's a panel of 9 judges for each event, divided into judges who tally the execution score and the difficulty score, and the reference panel that effectively audits the execution score.[2] The difficulty and execution scores are averaged. This is how you can get three-decimal scores due to averaging. Here is an example of a judge's score sheet.[2]

(Nevertheless, there are still issues with bias, where athletes or teams who benefit from a particular judge's biases might have their errors more gently scored. For example, on the bars, gymnasts are required to hit a handstand position within a 10-degree range of vertical. But a judge who is impacted by a bias, or a certain viewing position, many not notice that a particular handstand was at 15 degrees, and not deduct accordingly. This is where the AI judging may be particularly helpful.)

[1] https://www.gymnastics.sport/publicdir/rules/files/en_2022-2...

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYjhFnaoF90&t=408s

[3] https://www.nbcolympics.com/news/gymnastics-101-scoring