meetingcpp
Meeting C++ 2014 – An Interview with Hartmut Kaiser and Scott Meyers
C++ User Group Meetings in December
Using AES enryption in C++
Re:Where will Evolution lead C++17?
on Saturday November 08, 2014 @01:28PM (#8577709)
2008? There never was a C++08...
Last Standard was 2003 before C++11.
Where will Evolution lead C++17?
28 C++ User Group Meetings in November
Looking for C++17 – Proposals from Core, Modules, Networking, Reflection and UB
Re:C++ and zombies: a moving question
on Friday October 31, 2014 @05:39PM (#8541252)
Well, stay away from r-value references[1], and trust the defaults for move will make your live a lot easier.
To Quote Eric Niebler: "I want you to fear r-value references, like one could fear god" (last year at Meeting C++)
[1]except things like forwarding in templates, but thats fairly easy.
Re:C++ and zombies: a moving question
on Friday October 31, 2014 @04:01PM (#8540811)
Well, of course accessing the value of fh after foo would be fatal.
But how would you then sort a container of moveable-only objects?
An object should be accessible for reassigning a value after its move, as its often needed for algorithms, thats exactly why the C++ Standard mandates this. Move does really only make sense if the class holds a moveable allocation, such as a container, array etc., which makes copying expensive.
Re:C++ and zombies: a moving question
on Friday October 31, 2014 @03:58PM (#8540791)
cpp-next seems to be lost, at least for the web, but you still can access its content at the webarchive.org.