News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

mdonohue

Re:Myths of Enterprise Python on Tuesday March 24, 2015 @10:16AM (#9256684)
Defined as what? The Wikipedia article says the definition is unclear:

Languages are often colloquially referred to as "strongly typed" or "weakly typed". In fact, there is no universally accepted definition of what these terms mean. In general, there are more precise terms to represent the differences between type systems that lead people to call them "strong" or "weak".

He was exercising options because it is very cheap and he thought it had no tax impact. This also starts the clock on long term capital gains rules. It makes sense for early stage companies.

You might be thinking of this for more established companies where the exercise might require tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. That's a very different situation.

Re:Reddit source code on Wednesday October 01, 2014 @03:28AM (#8393216)
FYI, that includes pg's thinking on the use of lisp for viaweb

http://www.paulgraham.com/avg.html

Re:Page Weight Matters on Saturday December 22, 2012 @09:26PM (#4958340)
So "page weight" isn't the issue then, contradicting the title. It's the pipeline depth of the page.
Re:GCC 4.8 Has Automatic Return Type Deduction on Monday December 10, 2012 @06:53AM (#4898613)
Coverity, maker of c++ static analysis software, and where I used to work, has published a paper about their experience trying to parse customer code. It turns out that 'The language people code in? The strings their compiler accepts'

So yes, it is quite common to use syntax not available in other compilers. Most code is vetted against only one compiler to begin with.

http://www.stanford.edu/~engler/BLOC-coverity.pdf

Re:Eric Lippert is leaving Microsoft on Friday November 30, 2012 @02:39AM (#4852287)
But then I wouldn't have had a job. :) Good to see your name again Sean.