maytc
Show HN: Paintlustrator – a free iPad app to draw and export SVGs
Someone Still Has to Buy Your Product
Ask HN: Do you feel reading AI generated readme tiring?
It’s not just this but it’s that. This changes everything. This, and this and that.Reading this writing structure over and over is really starting to tire me out.
Why Vibe coding is eating software
Before it needs to write the code and have an external program execute it. Here it can change its mind mid execution. Kinda like what was observed in the CoT’s ah ha moment
Ask HN: Where in the dot com boom is AI today?
Curious of the parallels. Anyone whole lived through it around to give a picture?
Tell HN: Anthropic expires paid credits after a year
> Your organization “xxx” has $xxx Anthropic API credits that will expire on September 03, 2025 UTC.>> To ensure uninterrupted service, we recommend enabling auto-reload for your organization. When enabled, we’ll automatically add credits when your balance reaches a specified minimum. You can enable auto-reload in the Anthropic Console.
The puzzle assumes that the room temperature is greater than the cold milk's temperature. When I added that the room temperature is, say, -10 °C, Mercury fails to see the difference.
https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/chatgpt-search/ejcf...
Months in different locales can be written as yyyy-MM-dd. It can also be a catalog/reference number. So, it seems right that their embedding similarity is not perfectly aligned.
So, it's not a tokenizer problem. The text meant different things according to the LLM.
Throw that away, setting aligned SMART goals would achieve a similar effect as aligned OKRs.
You do that by having the entire organization's O and KR roll up and cascade down. My Objectives directly roll up to my parent organization's Key Result. My parent org's Objectives rolls up to their parent's KR, and so on to the top. Then, you have the top-level check downwards if the sets of OKRs still make sense in their entirety.
Unfortunately, I have never seen any organization I was with ever do this...
`You take a random ball out of the urn—it’s red—and discard it.`
How normal people read it: Given this specific instance where you just discarded a red ball from this urn, what's the probability of the next ball?
How it expects you to read it: Given infinitely many random samples from the urn. For cases where you get red, remove it, then take a second sample. What's the probability of the next ball, given all the samplings?