News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

mattas

Intel is still up 75%+ YTD.
Meanwhile, there will be a line of VCs out the door rushing to give this kid a few million dollars. Because of this.
"The Git Platform for Teams."
Re:Who's Afraid of Chinese Models? on Monday July 20, 2026 @11:18PM (#48987642)
"Right now, none of the above analysis applies because demand exceeds supply for frontier models, and supply is limited by a lack of compute."

It gets particularly hairy because models themselves can tune their "token verbosity" to manufacture demand for compute. If compute was such a precious resource, you'd think we'd be complaining that the output was too terse.

The ability for a vendor to determine ex post facto how much a query costs is a similarly new economic phenomenon to zero marginal cost.

I'd love to be losing like Anthropic.
"Everybody's Weirded Out by AI-Except the People Who Live in Zip Codes Starting with 940, 941, 944, 950 and 951"
The fact investors think (thought) SpaceX is worth more than $2T is another example of how they aren't familiar with rocket launches.
Re:Starship's Thirteenth Flight Test on Thursday July 16, 2026 @06:59PM (#48941393)
Shareholders lost $50B within a few seconds of the scrub.
Re:SPCX is now Wall Street's most shorted new stock on Thursday July 16, 2026 @03:29PM (#48939141)
A rational person isn't willing to pay more than the present value of future cash flows. Just like how a rational person wouldn't pay $101 for a $100 bill.

Where it gets fun is that: (1) we have people selling $100 bills for more than $100 and, (2) we have people gladly buying $100 bills for more than $100.

Re:SPCX is now Wall Street's most shorted new stock on Thursday July 16, 2026 @03:10PM (#48938884)
No one forced them to IPO well above the present value of their future cash flows. Or claim their TAM was $28 trillion.
Re:Speculative Growth and the AI "Bubble" [pdf] on Wednesday July 15, 2026 @10:06PM (#48929588)
The unlock is probably somewhere in that honest, load-bearing caveat.
Re:Financing the AI boom: from cash flows to debt [pdf] on Tuesday July 14, 2026 @08:32PM (#48914770)
Thinking out loud, is productivity the ultimate macro benefit of AI? Should we expect macro AI investment to be a leading indicator of macro productivity gains?

For example, did macro investment in factory automation predict future productivity gains?

Re:Ask HN: Add flag for AI-generated articles on Sunday July 12, 2026 @10:19PM (#48887075)
Might be more appropriate to add a "not AI" flag at this point.
Palantir has sold their flavor of "consulting" (forward-deployed whatevers) as an alternative to the old-school flavors of consulting (management consultants). Now, Alex Karp is upset because there's a new, new flavor of consulting (agents) that they now have to sell against.

Not only are your FDEs old news, but the new hotness is an order of magnitude cheaper. Tough sell.

"We dropped out of high school to build AI-powered snail teeth."
It's like a burgoo [1]. A steaming cauldron of community slop.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burgoo

Re:I think I have LLM burnout on Wednesday July 08, 2026 @11:27PM (#48840634)
I was describing this exact feeling today. I haven't quite been able to put it into words but I do get slightly physically ill. Almost similar to mild trypophobia?
Why bother learning anything when you can just use AI?
Not even close to the manhole cover speed record.
There's a disconnect between measured productivity and "anecdotal" productivity. I love this chart because it also demonstrates one of the most effective ways to increase productivity: simply reducing the workforce.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/OPHNFB

Not sure how this does anything to alter the laws of physics. But I guess it's a step in the right direction.

Older »