matijash
Wasp Framework 1.0 is coming
Wasp: The first framework that gives your web app a schema
Agent-First Carbon.now.sh Alternative
Maintainer's advice on contributing to open-source in 2026
Why are there so many new terminal multiplexers?
Deslopifying
Show HN: Wasp, a full-stack web framework, replaces its DSL with TypeScript
We Removed React Server Components from Tanstack.com
Building Drizzle ORM
GitHub's Stacked PRs
Why design matters for a web framework: a 7-year evolution
Wasp now lets you write your full-stack spec in 100% TypeScript
Typograms: A portable ASCII diagram format that renders to SVG
5 Years and $5M Later: Creating a New Language for Web Development Was a Mistake
Open Vibe – an interactive web dev course in Claude Code
They said AI would kill SaaS boilerplates, but it's doing the opposite
Re:Building a full-stack app with Wasp, an agent-friendly web framework
on Friday April 24, 2026 @09:51AM (#47890322)
Yes, the main thing is that we're trying to see if AI can have an easier time using one framework vs. another, and how important it is.
All Rails-like frameworks (Django, Laravel, or Wasp in this case) claim its helpful to use something opinionated and structured, which makes sense (the tradeoff is the flexibility, of course).
We've run some early tests[1] but plan to do a more substantial benchmark next.
[1] https://wasp.sh/blog/2026/03/26/nextjs-vs-wasp-40-percent-le...
4.0M tokens for Next.js vs. 2.5M tokens for Wasp: same app, same prompt
Next.js vs. Wasp: 40% Less Tokens for the Same App
ApiArk – an open-source, local-first Postman alternative
Next.js vs. Wasp: Use 42% fewer tokens for the same app
Ask HN: Are you a SWE that lost job purely due to AI? Share your story
Claude Code for Fullstack Dev – The Minimal Setup
Inventing a new programming language for web development was a mistake
Working in the Software Industry in 1989
I've run 11 Launch Weeks – here's the founder's perspective
Re:Show HN: Prototyper – AI design platform with its own compiler and ...
on Thursday September 04, 2025 @08:11AM (#45126353)
Looks neat, but I don't quite get it from the quick glance I took. What if I want to use ShadCN?