News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

markup

Re:HN: share your unneeded Google Wave invites on Wednesday September 30, 2009 @12:00PM (#852724)
As far as I know people won't be able to invite others, so there is no invite to share. You'll only be able to recommend (8) friends, and they will have priority on the others.

BTW: I am in the developer preview but I haven't received the invite for the real thing. I asked to the others in the sandbox but it doesn't look like there's any invite being received so far.

Re:Please tell us what features you'd like in news.ycombinator on Friday September 18, 2009 @08:24AM (#830118)
The duplicate detection should be improved, I have posted http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=830030 and it ended up being a duplicate of http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=828992 (the only difference is my entry pointed to the www cname)
Re: on Thursday September 10, 2009 @06:44AM (#815006)
Follow up by the NYT available at: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/09/google-plans-tools-...

PS: can anyone please edit the URL and remove the '#' at the end? It's caused by the FriendFeed bookmarklet and may lead to duplicate entries.

Re:The Value of Information (how can News be Monetized?) on Tuesday September 01, 2009 @09:19AM (#797945)
There is some kind of "second part" to this article, published today: http://informationarchitects.jp/pronto/
Re:Call for a Better Web on Tuesday August 18, 2009 @04:24PM (#771389)
I can't really imagine a better peer review other than hacker news to be honest. However I wish I'd got a more replies when I tried to get skilled people to read this (expecially from the english mothertongue), but that didn't happen.
Re:Call for a Better Web on Tuesday August 18, 2009 @03:37PM (#771272)
You say the internet is broken because authentication is a pain? You say there should be just one social network?

I didn't say the Internet is broken because authentication is a pain. I said the Web has been created to deal (and access) hypertexts. Nowadays the WWW is used for much more. People use it to shop, keep contacts with friends living far away, some use it to share their "lives" and the current state of art is far from being functional to the scope. To my personal point of view, it is broken by design when it comes to these scopes. And far from me trying to say there should be just a social network.

The gateway I idealize is not a giant bucket (or a silo) you'd fill with your stuff, that's exactly what I want to avoid. The "gateway" would just be a place you use to authenticate and authorize apps to access subsets of your data. Some of it (anagraphical data for the most part) would be stored on the gateway, and other stuff would be in much more appropiate places. Flickr, Twitter, Blogger, Facebook, et cetera. The model I idealize would be a common layer to build thing on, nothing more and nothing less.

Re:Call for a Better Web on Tuesday August 18, 2009 @02:45PM (#771140)
No need to apology, I did read that premise the way you explained it right now -- might have been naive now that I think about it. ;-)
Re:Call for a Better Web on Tuesday August 18, 2009 @01:11PM (#770903)
Yeah, that's more or less what I'd like it to work, but I think using phones or other devices that may get offline would be unworkable (at least in the present). You could, however, act as your own gateway just like you can do with OpenID right now
Re:Call for a Better Web on Tuesday August 18, 2009 @12:44PM (#770832)
Sorry about that
Re:Call for a Better Web on Tuesday August 18, 2009 @12:42PM (#770828)
Normal people don't care about a lot of stuff, but this doesn't stop research and development. The world would be a really boring place if we had to think solutions targeted at the "average Joe". I do care about this and if someone offered me a solution for these issues I'd buy it right away.

In regards to 2., you are right but today the same risk is multiplied on dozens of websites that I know basically nothing about. I don't know how they store and backup my stuff and I don't know how they deal it.

As per 4. OpenID and OAuth DO work (I use them a lot), what I tried to say is that they do not solve the underlying issue.

Re:Call for a Better Web on Tuesday August 18, 2009 @12:33PM (#770809)
Thank you for your suggestions, they do make sense. The only thing is that this is not a proposal, it's simply an article (but still, you are right)
Re:MSNBC.com acquires EveryBlock on Monday August 17, 2009 @12:07PM (#768369)
Also at http://www.holovaty.com/writing/everyblock-acquisition/ with some more personal details from Adrian

Ask HN: does anyone know when the Everyblock code is going to be released?

According to http://everyblock.com/about/faq/ and http://holovaty.com/writing/everyblock-future/ Everyblock's grant ends today (June, 30), and the team is supposed to release the code under the GPL license. Is anyone actually informed and know when this is going to happen? Those pages are kinda vague and do not set any real timeline.

( Read More... | 1 comment | 2 points | on HN )
Re:Jacob Kaplan-Moss: Real World Django on Sunday March 29, 2009 @06:52AM (#537274)
URL?
I posted your paper yesterday (http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=534399), no one seemed to bother... I am guessing bbc is sexier or something.

I really enjoyed it

Older »