market_hacker
Re:I Tried Gleam for Advent of Code, and I Get the Hype
on Saturday December 13, 2025 @11:37PM (#46260790)
i just implemented a project in elixir with LLM support and would never have considered that before. (i had never used elixir before) - So who knows maybe it will help adoption?
Re:PyTorch vs. TensorFlow in 2022
on Tuesday December 14, 2021 @12:45PM (#29554620)
Do any JAX experts know if there is an equivalent to https://captum.ai/ - a model interpretability library for pytorch?
In particular i want to be able to measure feature importance on both inputs and internal layers on a sample by sample basis. This is the only thing currently holding me back from using JAX right now.
Alternatively a simle to read/understand/port implementation of DeepLIFT would work too.
thanks
Re:Ask HN: What (side-)project are you working on?
on Tuesday March 16, 2021 @02:54PM (#26481229)
you probably know this but you're building a nice labelled training set for machine learning to help you automate the process later
Re:Agate: A Data Analysis Library for Journalists
on Tuesday October 27, 2015 @09:47PM (#10462420)
maybe i'm missing the point, but i can't see the advantage of using this over pandas
Re:Dataset: Ten Years of NFL Plays Analyzed, Visualized, Quizzified
on Sunday February 02, 2014 @10:47AM (#7166299)
I think there may be a problem with this kind of analysis - it seems to me that the "riskier" plays (2 point conversion, going for it, etc.) - are more likely attempted when coaches think they will work - not randomly. To really do a fair analysis of expectancy you would need trials where the play selection is chosen randomly. Anyone else agree with me?
Re:A High Frequency Trader's Apologia, Part 1
on Tuesday April 17, 2012 @04:28PM (#3854814)
no.
that would only work if every traded product on the planet was in a single matching engine.