marcusarmstrong

Challenging in an apartment setting, but the state of the art here is an Energy Recovery Ventilator (ERV) installed in your home to continuously refresh the air.

Rim brakes need frame reinforcement at their mount points too, albeit not adapters, so that’s 20g. Hubs are 20g heavier each… I wouldn’t really go for a 20 spoke wheel myself but if you did I suppose that would save 20g. 50g for thru axles. 120g on the brifters.

So to add it all up you’re looking at 770g in components/additions, offset by 75g skewers, 310g calipers, and an added 25g or so per rim for the brake track. So discs are naively something like +335g. I obviously agree it’s a heavier system, but I don’t think ballparking the penalty as triple what it actually is is reasonable.

In 2016 maybe.

On a disc brake bike, calipers are ~100g, rotors ~120g, and then you’ve got ~150g of tubing/fluid. They’re certainly heavier, but the components don’t even add up to 1000g, nevermind when you offset the rim brake component weights.

Gitlab does support this with “Merged Result pipelines”[0]. We use them extensively alongside their merge train functionality to sequential is everything and it’s fantastic.

[0]: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/pipelines/merged_results_pipel...

I’d be particularly interested in something along these lines in a 1U form factor if anybody is familiar with such a thing. Obviously the actual fan-less-ness is less important in that use case but I have a hard time justifying high wattage hardware for my home server operation, and racking provides a lot of convenience.

A TDP comparison is certainly reasonable, though we don't actually have real power consumption metrics so it's a challenging thing to really evaluate. But more to your question, it depends on whether you're trying to evaluate _this chip_ or the _chip family_. Personally I'm not going to be buying anything with the M1 in it because they aren't machines that fit what I need, but I'm extremely interested in benchmarks of the M1 because of what they tell us about the hypothetical M1X (or whatever it ends up being called) in a body that I would, in fact, purchase.

Worth qualifying the comparisons here with core counts... these are mostly 8 core/16 thread parts, with a few 6 core/12 thread parts, vs the M1 4+4.

A great question for the folks who actually do CPU design! As somebody who writes JS rather frequently I’m not complaining.

If anybody else was curious, it appears that the performance win of use of this instruction looks to be about 1-2% in general javascript workloads: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184023#c24

That's not true at all. HTTP/2 is hugely impactful without using push at all—multiplexing beyond 4/8 streams enables radically different, performant bundling strategies, all "for free" with zero configuration, just by the act of using the protocol.

Wikipedia claims MTr/mm^2s of:

  Intel 14: 37.5
  Intel 10: 100.8
  TSMC 16/14/12: 28.88
  TSMC 10: 52.51
  TSMC 7: 96.5 to 113.9, depending on iteration.
  TSMC 5: 173

150% vs Nashorn is an important caveat here. At {employer} we started our SSRing via Nashorn and later moved to a separately deployed Node service for performance reasons... and saw a 4x drop in time per request for rendering tasks.

Can’t feature detect during SSR, so making an educated guess and falling back gracefully (when possible—many times it just isn’t, as with ES6 syntax) is important to get initial page load right by default.

IMO it’s explained better in the Client Hints specification.

Browser vendor/version is hugely important information for triaging issues and implementing progressive enhancement approaches on large scale websites.

They can; Grigore was my advisor in college and I’ve seen him demo exactly that.

This... reads like propaganda to my (western) eyes.

I spent a year in SLC (funemployed) considering staying there long term but was scared off by long-term earning potential from what I had read online (vs. Boston area, where I previously and currently live[d]). These numbers are much more positive than others I had read. Congrats to those of you who’ve found broader-market-level roles in the area!

That has already been done with video auto play.

Mootools already is in conflict with the latest Ecmascript: https://mootools.net/core/docs/1.5.2/Types/Array#Array:Array...

No reason to start changing the spec for it now.

(And I say that as somebody that works at a company with what is likely one of the largest existing Mootools-based javascript codebases around)

This is just “using lots of memory”, not a “leak”.

I use Amethyst (https://github.com/ianyh/Amethyst) and cannot give it a stronger recommendation.

I recently needed to pick up all my childhood legos from my parents’ home and am now seeking a storage solution that... isn’t plastic. Anybody know of anything?

At my company, 304s account for 3% of our CDN requests.

> have chickens, goats, dogs, large garden with fruit and veg, pool

I have no interest in any of those things. And, in fact, negative interest in some of them.

I can walk to dozens of unique and interesting restaurants, share a bottle of wine and not worry about driving home. I can attend plays, concerts, and comedy shows whenever I'd like (again, all without driving). My friends can stop by and say hi without it being out of their way or even a big deal.

Where you live is a matter of trade offs. Different people have different value systems along these things. That shouldn't really be a surprising thing.

This is terrifying.

They simply don't work for multi-second exposures, however.

For whatever my anec-data is worth, I run a sports stats website as a hobby (which has a decidedly non-developer user base), and when looking at my own user breakdown I found that less than .1% of my traffic was IE10 or below.

So while there's still likely an insular group at play, it's not limited to just developers.