Re your edit: I know right! I've built a few thing with GPT-3 before but the ChatGPT API somehow gives a totally different result. Especially in regards to tone.
Slap Whisper API to this, you can practice with your voice and not only via typing.
Yes, currently it needs a severe promot optimization to increase the quality of the interview session.
Our idea is to seed several real interview questions, perhaps this will improve the quality of the interview.
If it's ok, I'll let you know after we make the update for you to give it another try.
Thank you for the feedback
Perhaps these mock interview can be a resource in itself later on?
We're looking to further optimize the prompt and definitely to cross check the facts that ChatGPT spit out (since its notorious to state false information as fact).
Hope you enjoy the MVP
Something we want to try next is to seed several real interview questions, perhaps it'll lead to a more quality interview.
Thanks for trying the MVP, we appreciate the feedback
Yes I do admit the interview is not perfect yet. More prompt engineering to optimize. I think with a few more optimization we can get ChatGPT to conduct a more quality interview session.
Sorry you didn't find value in the mvp yet, my teammate and I was taking ChatGPT API for a spin and share it as it. In hindsight we could've done more optimization before posting here.
If it's ok, I'll let you know after we optimize the prompt for you to try it again.
Thanks for the feedback, we appreciate it a lot
Hi HN!ChatGPT API was just released and I'm eager to hack something with it.So I created PracticeInterview.co to help people practice for their next job interview.ChatGPT acts as the interviewer and you can choose to interview for various roles such as Finance Manager, Social Media Manager, and Software Engineer.I think this is a cool implementation of ChatGPT and the interview sessions so far...
On the results, I agree. Definitely need more curation in regards to the voters for a more reliable result. So far I've validated the model kind of work and brings in some interesting insights.
Ideas I thought people would be interested in ends up having more not interested votes. Conversely ideas that I thought would be mediocre gather a lot of interest. I think there's a lot of work to polish this further.
In regards to registration, thanks for the insight. Initially I thought email is high friction, but perhaps I'm wrong. I'll try out login link and see how it compares!
If login link works, it's better for the platform too in fact, since I'll have a way to notify users e.g. send vote results, and create a way to bring people back to the site.
Thanks for trying it out
Hi Hacker News!My name is Marcel, and I created Valideate.comValideate is a quick way to validate your ideas so you can determine whether or not they are worth pursuing further.How does it work?1. You can post your rough idea on Valideate for free, but it costs 1 point. 2. To earn 1 point, you have to vote on 5 other ideas. 3. That's it!Right now, anyone who registers will instantly earn 5...