mangogogo

this was my main way of managing and processing my RAWs for years until i started using DxO PhotoLab. darktable is an excellent way to learn how to start editing IMO because it simplifies settings a bit less than other tools, is free, and from my experience has better denoise/tone mapping modules out of the box than RawTherapee. for my needs the library/lightroom was also very intuitive and lightweight.

i thought so as well; my eyes were beginning to glaze over. the MIT article talking about it is a much better read.

thinking the same here. combining the inaccurate data with the suspicious-looking sheen to the UI makes me think it was made with an LLM.

a site can be annoying or shady regardless of who it's from. i was personally very turned off by the heavy-handed popup and resorted to reading a recently archived version of the link.

high-volume, highly detailed writing with a confusing sense of grandiosity for something people haven't yet heard of. i'm sure it's great, but a lot of this smells like LLM.

Source or link?

this looks like amazing work, i'll be checking it out. thank you

i remember being hooked on Incredibots back when that was still a thing! that was how I heard about Box2D way back.

didn't you already post this earlier?

it's beyond parody

i was hoping the same, but then it turned out to be another article about LLMs.

i absolutely do notice. i just don't care, or need it, personally

yeah like… no shit?

wondering the same. someone let me know if an alternative comes along (or if they continue development somewhere else) ...

oh look, another ai slop article.

great, now everybody can vibe code even harder.