malka1986

yes, and i do not give a single fuck about that.

On Android TV, you can use https://smarttubeapp.github.io/ to get rid of ad without giving google money.

I do not work for free.

> keeping out bot

You can forget about it. It is not possible. Simple as that.

Thanks, i did not know about `privacy.resistfingerprinting`

I'll make sure to fail all cloudflare turnshit in the future.

they have the lowest approval ratings and legitimization in over half a century, because they're making everything shittier and shittier to the benefit of their corporate overlords.

I'm from the EU.

I'd rather China wins this. By a landslide.

I cant wait for the EU finally turns its back on the US and start integrating seriously with China.

too late anyway.

good luck to all of you.

The famous communists of hacker news. sigh.

If you are in the US, and are not fascist, I urge you to leave. You are in an equivalent of 1933 germany. It is gonna be dangerous to not bend for the great leader.

Hello, I am a single dev using an agent (Claude Code) on a solo project.

I have accepted that reading 100% of the generated code is not possible.

I am attempting to find methods to allow for clean code to be generated none the less.

I am using extremely strict DDD architecture. Yes it is totally overkill for a one man project.

Now i only have to be intimate with 2 parts of the code:

* the public facade of the modules, which also happens to be the place where authorization is checked.

* the orchestrators, where multiple modules are tied together.

If the inners of the module are a little sloppy (code duplication and al), it is not really an issue, as these do not have an effect at a distance with the rest of the code.

I have to be on the lookout though. It happens that the agent tries to break the boundaries between the modules, cheating its way with stuff like direct SQL queries.

Unless you are doing stuff that does not need to be maintened, there is still a need for a skilled human to maintain proper software architecture.

It is the managers who are doomed. The future is small team of dev answering directly to the cto.

I have exactly 0 choice of banks app that would run on a mobile OS that is neither android or google.

At the end of the day, I need a bank account, and access to it, would it only be for buying food, or paying my mortgage.

I need my bank app to run on it.

Yeah and we could run kimi. Th issue is energy, we should keep building nuclear reactor and renewable to power it.

If the clone is 1/10th of the price, and of equivalent quality, why would I use the original ? I would be undercut by my concurrents if i did that, it would be a very bad business decision.

> Isn't there pretty good indications that the chinese llms have been trained on top of the expensive models?

So what ?

I am making an app in Elixir.

100% of code is made by Claude.

It is damn good at making "blocks".

However, Elixir seems to be a langage that works very well for LLM, cf. https://elixirforum.com/t/llm-coding-benchmark-by-language/7...

you have to be crazy to run claude in YOLO mode outside of a constrained environment such as a docker container

Hopefully, AAA games era is coming to an end.

China made the us fall in kinda the same trap that the us madeade ussr fall into with the moon race.

It is yes. Your ability to create new meaning for words is awesome.

The reason its not stealing is because stealing means to remove someone of the ownership of something they own.

You are able to make your own définition though. The clear mark of a very intelligent mind.

Blocking ads is the same as stealing.

You are very intelligent.

Google is free to block me / my IP / ban my account.

I hate google, and I refuse to give them any money.

These robots will be used to eliminate the working class.

> It is absolutely infringement if you paint a picture in Ghibli style.

Only if you copy their characters. If you make your own character and story, and are replicating ghibli style, it is OK. Style is not copyrightable.

Using character is copyright infrigement. Using style is not.

> I don't accept the unregulated and uncontrolled use of LLMs for therapy for the same reason I don't accept arguments like "We should deregulate food safety because it means more food at lower cost to consumers"

That is not the argument. The argument is not about 'lower cost', it is about availability. There are not enough shrinks for everyone who would need it.

So it would be "We should deregulate food safety to avoid starving", which would be a valid argument.