makkes
[1] https://hub.docker.com/_/postgres#pgdata
[2] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/upgrading.html#UPGRA...
--- main_before.go 2025-10-15 09:56:16.467115934 +0200
+++ main.go 2025-10-15 09:52:14.798134654 +0200
@@ -13,8 +13,10 @@
slog.Info("starting server on :4000")
+ csrfProt := http.NewCrossOriginProtection()
+
// Wrap the mux with the http.NewCrossOriginProtection middleware.
- err := http.ListenAndServe(":4000", http.NewCrossOriginProtection(mux))
+ err := http.ListenAndServe(":4000", csrfProt.Handler(mux))
if err != nil {
slog.Error(err.Error())
os.Exit(1)https://github.com/neuphonic/neutts-air/issues/15#issuecomme...
So "no rate limits", while true, is kind of setting different expectations.
I personally sleep much better knowing that e.g. all major browser vendors cooperate on the CA/B (and elsewhere, e.g. the IETF, W3C, ECMA) instead of the biggest one dictating the rules (which, to be fair, happens to a certain degree, e.g. with Chrome leading the way for certain technologies).
It's not that hard to understand what OP means.
It would have been very very far from what you usually call an exit, though. Nobody would have cashed out, except maybe some of the VCs and I'm not sure if they'd have called it a successful exit in terms of financial win.
Actually, the second number is the sum of the number of seconds that all cores on the machine have spent idle, so that number may be higher than the first one. Source: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterp...
* Are scopes used? => https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-3.3
* Appropriate header values? => https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-7 as well as https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6750
* Can redirect URI be overrided in auth request (my personal favorite)? Sth. like https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-10.6 ?