madcadmium

> by all metrics, immigrants are a net positive to society.

What about wage suppression?

"Someday, the sky will fall"

Ok.

> This would provide an incredibly precise estimate of the user's location.

Within ~250 miles of their location is not "incredibly precise"

I would like to read this article but am unwilling to provide even a fake e-mail address to do so

I wonder how many of their telecom devices like routers, switches, etc. have bombs implanted in their power supplies

I wonder how many of their telecom devices like routers, switches, etc. have bombs implanted in their power supplies

His wealthy parents, probably

Does it also monitor the contents of your copy/paste buffer? It would scoop up a ton of privileged data if so.

> Operations and Sysadmins I don't forsee ever changing, especially with AI.

Why not?

Yes, the woman who started Ark Invest because it was "God's will"

Uh oh, they're going to have to kill the entire Department of Justice next.

When I managed a large fleet of EC2 instances running CentOS I had Ansible running locally on each machine via a cron job. I only used remote SSH to orchestrate deployments (stop service, upgrade, test, put back in service).

How much leverage though?

Yeah, I was really confused. This guy loves his BMW M3 but wants to ditch it for a Tesla?

It's in the article:

> Ken didn’t know it when all this was happening (and it’s not at all obvious from the Apple prompts), but clicking “Allow” would not have allowed the attackers to change Ken’s password. Rather, clicking “Allow” displays a six digit PIN that must be entered on Ken’s device — allowing Ken to change his password. It appears that these rapid password reset prompts are being used to make a subsequent inbound phone call spoofing Apple more believable.

Oh, the irony!

You can control what messages you receive by closing your client

The remaining employee's workloads are about to increase 50%

Because people who don't bother to read the article assume it's a new breach, as we can see in the comments here ("another breach"). I'm not saying that it makes it better or worse.

This is not a new breach, it is a disclosure of additional findings from the last breach.

This is not a new breach, it is a disclosure of additional findings from the last breach.

This is not a new breach, it is a disclosure of additional findings from the last breach.

That's rich coming from IBM

This is karma for their passive-aggressive blog post about Okta's security incident one week earlier

Isn't Equifax part of a de facto monopoly? Okta doesn't have that luxury. Security is also not Equifax's core competency, but it is supposed to be Okta's. I would be happy for you to be right, but I think this happening a second time to Okta is going to cause massive damage to their reputation in the industry.

Okta outsources their support staff to save millions of dollars while losing billions of dollars in market cap each time their support staff gets hacked.

Competitive advantage?

Locking down what, exactly?

That would be contrary to Okta's zero-trust security model.

Okta employee here. I can assure you that there are no clear-text credentials in our source code.