luroc
As in a view/site that aggregates top posts across Lemmy instances?
Do you really not see the geostrategic advantage in being able to control who gets "free" energy and who doesn't?
This post is quite good aswell: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/NfdHG6oHBJ8Qxc26s/the-zettel...
As a German I can assure you that from within leftist circles no one would think of Die Linke as a communist party . They'd rather think of KPD but that party is not existing anymore so I went with the least fringe party that actually has some kind of consensus on communist ideas. Everyone I know who is affiliated to Die Linke is aiming for socialism and doesn't support any communist tendencies. From what I read and heard the same holds true for a majority of party members.
I know that parts of the general public don't recognize that or don't care, which is probably due to the usual disproportional media coverage for more extreme wings of less politically centered parties, but that doesn't change the real circumstances and I really don't get how the public opinion would be an argument against a factual statement.
I understand that your message wasn't supposed to be nuanced but just let me clarify it then, would you?
http://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php/Release_notes/1.0#Us...
Saying that there is something you can do with a device without an explanation doesn't automatically imply that it's easy to use. Ease of use is a metric for how much of the full potential of something you can utilize with as little instructions as possible. The article has a point that this ease of use is quite reduced when you are disabled or don't have prior knowledge of devices.
I'm not saying that the title couldn't be less sensational but simply saying that iPhones aren't difficult to use is wrong aswell.