louismg
Smartphones Have Virtually Eliminated Boredom from the Modern Life
A Decade of Silos Has Throttled Open Content Distribution
Decentraland shows the potential of blockchain and VR combined
Community in which active members get paid for their contributions
Best VR Headsets 2017 (Buyer's Guide)
Real-Time Independent Site Ratings and Comments: LinkRev Portal/Browser Plugins
Show HN: Retro Patents – Nostalgic Music and Technology Prints
Startup behind chewable coffee created a performance-enhancing 'superhuman fuel'
Technology is subtly transforming the restaurant experience as we know it
Criteria for ICO assessment to be used in selecting reactive coins
Making Decentralized Commerce a Reality with MOBI Stellar Network and DApp Store
20 simple employee engagement survey questions every company should ask
Can Blockchain Help Investor Trust in the Asset Under Management (AUM) Market?
Laretal – The social network of ideas
More Americans Watched the Total Solar Eclipse Than the Super Bowl
A brief history of Android's /system/bin
Re:Why you shouldn't exercise to lose weight
on Friday April 29, 2016 @05:13PM (#11598806)
Excellent progress, Mike. My dad (an MD) always simplified weight loss as calories in minus calories out. Exercise accelerates the calorie burn (which you know) and moderating the intake is key.
A couple years ago, I started using Fitbit and increased my exercise significantly. I lost 5 pounds a month for 6 straight months.
Buzzfeed Profiles Google CEO Sundar Pichai
Apple buys massive 777,000 foot Sunnyvale space for newest campus
What If We Redid the 2000 .Com Monopoly Edition for Today's Web?
Social Stream Recommendations Not for OCD Curators
When Priced for Perfection, Startups Not Given Room for Error
Re:Startups from 2010: Acquired, Pivoted or Still Going?
on Sunday June 29, 2014 @07:53PM (#7962980)
Sounds good enough to me. +1.
Re:Startups from 2010: Acquired, Pivoted or Still Going?
on Sunday June 29, 2014 @07:51PM (#7962974)
Thanks. I considered this post would only be of interest to me, and even then, it'd probably be worth it. Glad HN picked it up.
Re:Startups from 2010: Acquired, Pivoted or Still Going?
on Sunday June 29, 2014 @07:50PM (#7962968)
Acknowledged. Thanks for checking in.
Re:Startups from 2010: Acquired, Pivoted or Still Going?
on Sunday June 29, 2014 @06:08PM (#7962660)
Lots of the companies acquired had their product changed or killed afterward. This could have been a much longer post.
Re:Startups from 2010: Acquired, Pivoted or Still Going?
on Sunday June 29, 2014 @06:07PM (#7962658)
A big number of those in the "Acquired" column were acquihires that saw the product killed shortly after.
Re:Startups from 2010: Acquired, Pivoted or Still Going?
on Sunday June 29, 2014 @06:06PM (#7962655)
There's no question I wrote this with a consumer/social filter. I didn't go into enterprise (like storage, for example), even though I worked 8 1/2 years at a network storage company. There's definite bias toward a Twitter platform that never materialized.
I was careful to say "50 Top" instead of "Top 50". I know it's nuanced, but I didn't want it to be an end-all be-all king of lists. Just "Hey - here's 50 I'm watching."
Re:Startups from 2010: Acquired, Pivoted or Still Going?
on Sunday June 29, 2014 @04:58PM (#7962378)
So you're saying you want this incredibly long post to be even longer? :)